Abstract
The network organization of the human brain varies across individuals, changes with development and aging, and differs in disease. Discovering the major dimensions along which this variability is displayed remains a central goal of both neuroscience and clinical medicine. Such efforts can be usefully framed within the context of the brain's modular network organization, which can be assessed quantitatively using computational techniques and extended for the purposes of multi-scale analysis, dimensionality reduction, and biomarker generation. Although the concept of modularity and its utility in describing brain network organization is clear, principled methods for comparing multi-scale communities across individuals and time are surprisingly lacking. Here, we present a method that uses multi-layer networks to simultaneously discover the modular structure of many subjects at once. This method builds upon the well-known multi-layer modularity maximization technique, and provides a viable and principled tool for studying differences in network communities across individuals and within individuals across time. We test this method on two datasets and identify consistent patterns of inter-subject community variability, demonstrating that this variability – which would be undetectable using past approaches – is associated with measures of cognitive performance. In general, the multi-layer, multi-subject framework proposed here represents an advance over current approaches by straighforwardly mapping community assignments across subjects and holds promise for future investigations of inter-subject community variation in clinical populations or as a result of task constraints.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 115990 |
Journal | Neuroimage |
Volume | 202 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 15 2019 |
Funding
RFB, MB, and DSB would like to acknowledge support from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation , the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation , the ISI Foundation , the Paul Allen Foundation , the Army Research Laboratory ( W911NF-10-2-0022 ), the Army Research Office ( Bassett-W911NF-14-1-0679 , Grafton-W911NF-16-1-0474 , DCIST- W911NF-17-2-0181 ), the Office of Naval Research , the National Institute of Mental Health ( 2-R01-DC-009209-11 , R01-MH112847 , R01-MH107235 , R21-M MH-106799 ), the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development ( 1R01HD086888-01 ), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01-NS099348-01), and the National Science Foundation ( BCS-1441502 , BCS-1430087 , NSF PHY-1554488 and BCS-1631550 ). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of any of the funding agencies. Data were provided in part by the Human Connectome Project, WU-Minn Consortium (Principal Investigators: David Van Essen and Kamil Ugurbil; 1U54MH091657 ) funded by the 16 NIH Institutes and Centers that support the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research; and by the McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neurology
- Cognitive Neuroscience