The Contributions of Epidemiology to the Understanding of Childhood Seizures and Epilepsy

Anne T. Berg*, Shlomo Shinnar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

53 Scopus citations

Abstract

Up through the 1960s, studies of epilepsy were based on patients seen in tertiary referral centers, many of whom had refractory epilepsy. Based on these early studies, epilepsy was believed to be a chronic, progressive, and incurable disorder. Seizures were thought to cause damage and result in further seizures. Clinical management of children with seizures reflected these beliefs. Over the last 25 to 30 years, epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that, contrary to these earlier beliefs, the prognosis of most childhood seizures and epilepsy is excellent. Prognosis is largely determined by the underlying etiology and not the seizures themselves. The differences in the assessment of the prognosis of seizures derived from the earlier studies versus the later epidemiologic studies are largely due to several biases that occurred in the earlier studies. These biases are explained. Several examples are provided of how the epidemiologic studies have greatly altered the prevailing views regarding the prognosis of seizures, and, by doing so, the management of seizures. (J Child Neurol 1994;9(Suppl):2S19-2S26).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2S19-2S26
JournalJournal of Child Neurology
Volume9
Issue number2_suppl
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 1994

Funding

Supported by grants R01 NS31146 (A.T.B.) and ROl NS26151 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Contributions of Epidemiology to the Understanding of Childhood Seizures and Epilepsy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this