Abstract: Understanding novel phrases (e.g. upside‐down daisy) and classifying objects in categories named by phrases ought to have common properties, but you'd never know it from current theories. The best candidate for both jobs is the Theory Theory, but it faces difficulties when theories are impoverished. A potential solution is a dual approach that couples theories (representations‐about categories) with fixed mentalese expressions (representations‐of categories). Both representations combine information in parallel when understanding phrases. Although there are objections to the notion that theories can combine, some of them lose their force when applied to a suitable dual model.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||33|
|Journal||Mind & Language|
|State||Published - Jan 1 1995|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language