The delayed emergence of penal modernism in Florida

Heather Schoenfeld*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recently, punishment scholars have challenged the dominant historiography of a relatively uncontested period of penal modernism or penal welfarism across the USA between the Second World War and the 1960s. However, scholarship has not yet explained why penal modernism failed to take hold in particular regions and states. Using the social history of punishment in Florida, I argue that penal modernism failed to take hold in Florida for three reasons: the effect of political arrangements on the ability of political and bureaucratic actors to reform penal institutions; the timing of modern penal initiatives with the capacity of state bureaucracies; and the precedent that linked punishment policy and practices to cultural assumptions about 'black labor'. The findings suggest that punishment scholars can draw on historical institutionalist scholarship in order to understand continuity and change in penality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)258-284
Number of pages27
JournalPunishment and Society
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Keywords

  • history
  • politics
  • prison system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The delayed emergence of penal modernism in Florida'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this