The design risks framework: Understanding metacognition for iteration

Spencer E. Carlson*, Daniel G. Rees Lewis, Leesha V. Maliakal, Elizabeth M. Gerber, Matthew Wayne Easterday

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Iteration is an important design process that novice designers struggle to follow. However, iteration is difficult to coach because we do not understand the underlying metacognitive knowledge required for effective iteration. We developed the Design Risks Framework, which helps researchers to identify the knowledge underlying three metacognitive processes that control iteration: focusing attention on key areas of the project, identifying project risks, and choosing iterative strategies to mitigate risks. We tested the framework over a 6-week period with 5 novice design teams and found that novices seemed to lack metacognitive knowledge of 49 criteria for identifying project risks. By using this framework to diagnose knowledge gaps and design coaching interventions, educators and managers can improve how novice designers iterate in design projects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100961
JournalDesign Studies
Volume70
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2020

Keywords

  • design cognition
  • design knowledge
  • design metacognition
  • design process
  • reasoning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Architecture
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Engineering(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Artificial Intelligence

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The design risks framework: Understanding metacognition for iteration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this