TY - JOUR
T1 - The development of iManage-PC, an online symptom monitoring and self-management tool for men with clinically localized prostate cancer
AU - Murphy, Karly M.
AU - Sauer, Christina
AU - Yang, Dershung
AU - Hass, Niina
AU - Novakovic, Kristian
AU - Helfand, Brian
AU - Nadler, Robert
AU - Schalet, Benjamin D.
AU - Victorson, David
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr Victorson (principal investigator) received funding to conduct this study through a grant from the American Cancer Society-Illinois Division and a pilot grant from the John and Carol Walter Center for Urological Health at NorthShore University Health System. Dr Murphy reports being supported by training grants from the National Cancer Institute (CA193193 and CA122061) during the conduct of the study. Dr Victorson, Ms Haas, and Dr Helfand report grants from the American Cancer Society-Illinois Division during the conduct of the study. Dr Nadler reports that he is a Retrophin speaker. Ms Sauer, Dr Yang, Dr Novakovic, and Dr Schalet have nothing to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/12/9
Y1 - 2021/12/9
N2 - Background: Prostate cancer (PC) often impacts 4 major aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQL): urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction, and anxiety. Online tools may be helpful in supporting the development of self-management skills that can improve HRQL. Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and pilot-test an online symptom monitoring and self-management program, iManage-PC. Methods: A literature search, input from experts, and feedback from patients were used to develop iManage-PC. A 4-week, single-arm pilot study was conducted with 96 men with prostate cancer. We evaluated system usability, acceptance, and satisfaction and examined preliminary effects on patient-reported outcomes. Results: Rates of retention (94.8%) and adherence to symptom monitoring (95.0%-97.0%) were high. Most participants rated the tool as satisfactory and acceptable (81.2%-94.3%). Related-samples Wilcoxon signed rank tests revealed that participants reported increased self-efficacy related to their ability to manage their adverse effects (T = 1772.0, P < .001, r = 0.39), physical discomfort (T = 1259.0, P < .001, r = 0.40), and stress and worry (T = 1108.5, P = .001, r = 0.34). Global mental and physical health also improved (T = 1322.0, P = .032, r = 0.23, and T = 1409.0, P = .001, r = 0.35, respectively). Conclusions: Future research with such tools should examine the potential role of cut-score–derived management interventions to improve engagement, symptom management self-efficacy, and HRQL. Implications for Practice: Our findings are consistent with a growing body of literature that supports the feasibility and acceptability of remotely delivered interventions.
AB - Background: Prostate cancer (PC) often impacts 4 major aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQL): urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction, and anxiety. Online tools may be helpful in supporting the development of self-management skills that can improve HRQL. Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and pilot-test an online symptom monitoring and self-management program, iManage-PC. Methods: A literature search, input from experts, and feedback from patients were used to develop iManage-PC. A 4-week, single-arm pilot study was conducted with 96 men with prostate cancer. We evaluated system usability, acceptance, and satisfaction and examined preliminary effects on patient-reported outcomes. Results: Rates of retention (94.8%) and adherence to symptom monitoring (95.0%-97.0%) were high. Most participants rated the tool as satisfactory and acceptable (81.2%-94.3%). Related-samples Wilcoxon signed rank tests revealed that participants reported increased self-efficacy related to their ability to manage their adverse effects (T = 1772.0, P < .001, r = 0.39), physical discomfort (T = 1259.0, P < .001, r = 0.40), and stress and worry (T = 1108.5, P = .001, r = 0.34). Global mental and physical health also improved (T = 1322.0, P = .032, r = 0.23, and T = 1409.0, P = .001, r = 0.35, respectively). Conclusions: Future research with such tools should examine the potential role of cut-score–derived management interventions to improve engagement, symptom management self-efficacy, and HRQL. Implications for Practice: Our findings are consistent with a growing body of literature that supports the feasibility and acceptability of remotely delivered interventions.
KW - Online
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Self-efficacy
KW - Symptom management
KW - Symptom monitoring
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121043844&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121043844&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000948
DO - 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000948
M3 - Article
C2 - 33867430
AN - SCOPUS:85121043844
SN - 0162-220X
VL - 45
SP - E309-E319
JO - Cancer Nursing
JF - Cancer Nursing
IS - 1
ER -