TY - JOUR
T1 - The downside of greater lexical influences
T2 - Selectively poorer speech perception in noise
AU - Lam, Boji P.W.
AU - Xie, Zilong
AU - Tessmer, Rachel
AU - Chandrasekarana, Bharath
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (Grant R01 DC-013315 to B. Chandrasekaran). We thank Kristin J. Van Engen, Kirsten Smayda, Han-Gyol Yi, and Jasmine E. B. Phelps for their invaluable assistance in stimulus preparation, data management, and data analysis. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Purpose: Although lexical information influences phoneme perception, the extent to which reliance on lexical information enhances speech processing in challenging listening environments is unclear. We examined the extent to which individual differences in lexical influences on phonemic processing impact speech processing in maskers containing varying degrees of linguistic information (2-talker babble or pink noise). Method: Twenty-nine monolingual English speakers were instructed to ignore the lexical status of spoken syllables (e.g., gift vs. kift) and to only categorize the initial phonemes (/g/vs./k/). The same participants then performed speech recognition tasks in the presence of 2-talker babble or pink noise in audio-only and audiovisual conditions. Results: Individuals who demonstrated greater lexical influences on phonemic processing experienced greater speech processing difficulties in 2-talker babble than in pink noise. These selective difficulties were present across audio-only and audiovisual conditions. Conclusion: Individuals with greater reliance on lexical processes during speech perception exhibit impaired speech recognition in listening conditions in which competing talkers introduce audible linguistic interferences. Future studies should examine the locus of lexical influences/interferences on phonemic processing and speechin-speech processing.
AB - Purpose: Although lexical information influences phoneme perception, the extent to which reliance on lexical information enhances speech processing in challenging listening environments is unclear. We examined the extent to which individual differences in lexical influences on phonemic processing impact speech processing in maskers containing varying degrees of linguistic information (2-talker babble or pink noise). Method: Twenty-nine monolingual English speakers were instructed to ignore the lexical status of spoken syllables (e.g., gift vs. kift) and to only categorize the initial phonemes (/g/vs./k/). The same participants then performed speech recognition tasks in the presence of 2-talker babble or pink noise in audio-only and audiovisual conditions. Results: Individuals who demonstrated greater lexical influences on phonemic processing experienced greater speech processing difficulties in 2-talker babble than in pink noise. These selective difficulties were present across audio-only and audiovisual conditions. Conclusion: Individuals with greater reliance on lexical processes during speech perception exhibit impaired speech recognition in listening conditions in which competing talkers introduce audible linguistic interferences. Future studies should examine the locus of lexical influences/interferences on phonemic processing and speechin-speech processing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020638084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020638084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-16-0133
DO - 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-16-0133
M3 - Article
C2 - 28586824
AN - SCOPUS:85020638084
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 60
SP - 1662
EP - 1673
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 6
ER -