TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of two different ankle-foot orthoses on gait of patients with acute hemiparetic cerebrovascular accident
AU - Rao, Noel
AU - Wening, Jason
AU - Hasso, Daniel
AU - Gnanapragasam, Gnanapradeep
AU - Perera, Priyan
AU - Srigiriraju, Padma
AU - Aruin, Alexander S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2014 Noel Rao et al.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Objective. To compare the effects of two types of ankle-foot orthoses on gait of patients with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and to evaluate their preference in using each AFO type. Design. Thirty individuals with acute hemiparetic CVA were tested without an AFO, with an off-the-shelf carbon AFO (C-AFO), and with a custom plastic AFO (P-AFO) in random order at the time of initial orthotic fitting. Gait velocity, cadence, stride length, and step length were collected using an electronic walkway and the subjects were surveyed about their perceptions of each device. Results. Subjects walked significantly faster, with a higher cadence, longer stride, and step lengths, when using either the P-AFO or the C-AFO as compared to no AFO (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between gait parameters of the two AFOs. However, the subjects demonstrated a statistically significant preference of using P-AFO in relation to their balance, confidence, and sense of safety during ambulation (P < 0.05). Moreover, if they had a choice, 50.87 ± 14.7% of the participants preferred the P-AFO and 23.56 ± 9.70% preferred the C-AFO. Conclusions. AFO use significantly improved gait in patients with acute CVA. The majority of users preferred the P-AFO over the Cf-AFO especially when asked about balance and sense of safety.
AB - Objective. To compare the effects of two types of ankle-foot orthoses on gait of patients with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and to evaluate their preference in using each AFO type. Design. Thirty individuals with acute hemiparetic CVA were tested without an AFO, with an off-the-shelf carbon AFO (C-AFO), and with a custom plastic AFO (P-AFO) in random order at the time of initial orthotic fitting. Gait velocity, cadence, stride length, and step length were collected using an electronic walkway and the subjects were surveyed about their perceptions of each device. Results. Subjects walked significantly faster, with a higher cadence, longer stride, and step lengths, when using either the P-AFO or the C-AFO as compared to no AFO (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between gait parameters of the two AFOs. However, the subjects demonstrated a statistically significant preference of using P-AFO in relation to their balance, confidence, and sense of safety during ambulation (P < 0.05). Moreover, if they had a choice, 50.87 ± 14.7% of the participants preferred the P-AFO and 23.56 ± 9.70% preferred the C-AFO. Conclusions. AFO use significantly improved gait in patients with acute CVA. The majority of users preferred the P-AFO over the Cf-AFO especially when asked about balance and sense of safety.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986624752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986624752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2014/301469
DO - 10.1155/2014/301469
M3 - Article
C2 - 25276433
AN - SCOPUS:84986624752
SN - 2090-2867
VL - 2014
JO - Rehabilitation Research and Practice
JF - Rehabilitation Research and Practice
M1 - 301469
ER -