Abstract
Journalists and authors of trade books increasingly assert a female advantage in leadership, whereby women are more likely than men to lead in a style that is effective under contemporary conditions. Contrasting our analysis of these claims with Vecchio's [Leadersh. Q. 13 (2002) 643] analysis, we show that women have some advantages in typical leadership style but suffer some disadvantages from prejudicial evaluations of their competence as leaders, especially in masculine organizational contexts. Nonetheless, more women are rising into leadership roles at all levels, including elite executive roles. We suggest reasons for this rise and argue that organizations can capture the symbols of progressive social change and modernity by appointments of women in key positions.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 807-834 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | Leadership Quarterly |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2003 |
Keywords
- Gender
- Leadership style
- Meta-analysis
- Prejudice
- Sex differences
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Sociology and Political Science
- Applied Psychology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management