The forgotten grammatical category

Adjective use in agrammatic aphasia

Aya Meltzer-Asscher*, Cynthia K Thompson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In contrast to nouns and verbs, the use of adjectives in agrammatic aphasia has not been systematically studied. However, because of the linguistic and psycholinguistic attributes of adjectives, some of which overlap with nouns and some with verbs, analysis of adjective production is important for testing theories of word class production deficits in agrammatism. Aims: The objective of the current study was to compare adjective use in agrammatic and healthy individuals, focusing on three factors: overall adjective production rate, production of predicative and attributive adjectives, and production of adjectives with complex argument structure. Method and procedures: Narratives elicited from 14 agrammatic and 14 control participants were coded for open class grammatical category production (i.e., nouns, verbs, adjectives), with each adjective also coded for its syntactic environment (attributive/predicative) and argument structure. Outcomes and results: Overall, agrammatic speakers used adjectives in proportions similar to that of cognitively healthy speakers. However, they exhibited a greater proportion of predicative adjectives and a lesser proportion of attributive adjectives, compared to controls. Additionally, agrammatic participants produced adjectives with less complex argument structure than controls. Conclusions: The overall normal-like frequency of adjectives produced by agrammatic speakers suggests that agrammatism does not involve an inherent difficulty with adjectives as a word class or with predication, or that it entails a deficit in processing low imageability words. However, agrammatic individuals' reduced production of attributive adjectives and adjectives with complements extends previous findings of an adjunction deficit and of impairment in complex argument structure processing, respectively, to the adjectival domain. The results suggest that these deficits are not tied to a specific grammatical category.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-68
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Neurolinguistics
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Broca Aphasia
Aphasia
speech disorder
Psycholinguistics
Linguistics
deficit
psycholinguistics
Adjective
Grammatical Categories
Agrammatic Aphasia
linguistics
narrative

Keywords

  • Adjectives
  • Adjunction
  • Agrammatic aphasia
  • Argument structure
  • Grammatical categories
  • Narrative speech

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{bb20c9b9be4d4959ad09f642c86d2b66,
title = "The forgotten grammatical category: Adjective use in agrammatic aphasia",
abstract = "Background: In contrast to nouns and verbs, the use of adjectives in agrammatic aphasia has not been systematically studied. However, because of the linguistic and psycholinguistic attributes of adjectives, some of which overlap with nouns and some with verbs, analysis of adjective production is important for testing theories of word class production deficits in agrammatism. Aims: The objective of the current study was to compare adjective use in agrammatic and healthy individuals, focusing on three factors: overall adjective production rate, production of predicative and attributive adjectives, and production of adjectives with complex argument structure. Method and procedures: Narratives elicited from 14 agrammatic and 14 control participants were coded for open class grammatical category production (i.e., nouns, verbs, adjectives), with each adjective also coded for its syntactic environment (attributive/predicative) and argument structure. Outcomes and results: Overall, agrammatic speakers used adjectives in proportions similar to that of cognitively healthy speakers. However, they exhibited a greater proportion of predicative adjectives and a lesser proportion of attributive adjectives, compared to controls. Additionally, agrammatic participants produced adjectives with less complex argument structure than controls. Conclusions: The overall normal-like frequency of adjectives produced by agrammatic speakers suggests that agrammatism does not involve an inherent difficulty with adjectives as a word class or with predication, or that it entails a deficit in processing low imageability words. However, agrammatic individuals' reduced production of attributive adjectives and adjectives with complements extends previous findings of an adjunction deficit and of impairment in complex argument structure processing, respectively, to the adjectival domain. The results suggest that these deficits are not tied to a specific grammatical category.",
keywords = "Adjectives, Adjunction, Agrammatic aphasia, Argument structure, Grammatical categories, Narrative speech",
author = "Aya Meltzer-Asscher and Thompson, {Cynthia K}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.04.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "48--68",
journal = "Journal of Neurolinguistics",
issn = "0911-6044",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

The forgotten grammatical category : Adjective use in agrammatic aphasia. / Meltzer-Asscher, Aya; Thompson, Cynthia K.

In: Journal of Neurolinguistics, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 48-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The forgotten grammatical category

T2 - Adjective use in agrammatic aphasia

AU - Meltzer-Asscher, Aya

AU - Thompson, Cynthia K

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Background: In contrast to nouns and verbs, the use of adjectives in agrammatic aphasia has not been systematically studied. However, because of the linguistic and psycholinguistic attributes of adjectives, some of which overlap with nouns and some with verbs, analysis of adjective production is important for testing theories of word class production deficits in agrammatism. Aims: The objective of the current study was to compare adjective use in agrammatic and healthy individuals, focusing on three factors: overall adjective production rate, production of predicative and attributive adjectives, and production of adjectives with complex argument structure. Method and procedures: Narratives elicited from 14 agrammatic and 14 control participants were coded for open class grammatical category production (i.e., nouns, verbs, adjectives), with each adjective also coded for its syntactic environment (attributive/predicative) and argument structure. Outcomes and results: Overall, agrammatic speakers used adjectives in proportions similar to that of cognitively healthy speakers. However, they exhibited a greater proportion of predicative adjectives and a lesser proportion of attributive adjectives, compared to controls. Additionally, agrammatic participants produced adjectives with less complex argument structure than controls. Conclusions: The overall normal-like frequency of adjectives produced by agrammatic speakers suggests that agrammatism does not involve an inherent difficulty with adjectives as a word class or with predication, or that it entails a deficit in processing low imageability words. However, agrammatic individuals' reduced production of attributive adjectives and adjectives with complements extends previous findings of an adjunction deficit and of impairment in complex argument structure processing, respectively, to the adjectival domain. The results suggest that these deficits are not tied to a specific grammatical category.

AB - Background: In contrast to nouns and verbs, the use of adjectives in agrammatic aphasia has not been systematically studied. However, because of the linguistic and psycholinguistic attributes of adjectives, some of which overlap with nouns and some with verbs, analysis of adjective production is important for testing theories of word class production deficits in agrammatism. Aims: The objective of the current study was to compare adjective use in agrammatic and healthy individuals, focusing on three factors: overall adjective production rate, production of predicative and attributive adjectives, and production of adjectives with complex argument structure. Method and procedures: Narratives elicited from 14 agrammatic and 14 control participants were coded for open class grammatical category production (i.e., nouns, verbs, adjectives), with each adjective also coded for its syntactic environment (attributive/predicative) and argument structure. Outcomes and results: Overall, agrammatic speakers used adjectives in proportions similar to that of cognitively healthy speakers. However, they exhibited a greater proportion of predicative adjectives and a lesser proportion of attributive adjectives, compared to controls. Additionally, agrammatic participants produced adjectives with less complex argument structure than controls. Conclusions: The overall normal-like frequency of adjectives produced by agrammatic speakers suggests that agrammatism does not involve an inherent difficulty with adjectives as a word class or with predication, or that it entails a deficit in processing low imageability words. However, agrammatic individuals' reduced production of attributive adjectives and adjectives with complements extends previous findings of an adjunction deficit and of impairment in complex argument structure processing, respectively, to the adjectival domain. The results suggest that these deficits are not tied to a specific grammatical category.

KW - Adjectives

KW - Adjunction

KW - Agrammatic aphasia

KW - Argument structure

KW - Grammatical categories

KW - Narrative speech

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899904584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899904584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.04.001

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 48

EP - 68

JO - Journal of Neurolinguistics

JF - Journal of Neurolinguistics

SN - 0911-6044

IS - 1

ER -