TY - JOUR
T1 - “The Forgotten Minority”
T2 - Perpetuation of Ableism in Medical Education
AU - Haywood, Carol
AU - Lagu, Tara
AU - Salinger, Maggie
AU - López-Rosado, Roberto
AU - DeJong, Christene
AU - Iezzoni, Lisa I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2024.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Accounting for approximately 1 in 4 community-dwelling adults in the United States (US), people with disabilities (PWD) experience significant disparities in health care quality, access, and outcomes. At the same time, US physicians have reported feeling unprepared to care for PWD and have revealed significant negative bias about this population. Objective: To understand how physicians are trained to care for PWD in US medical schools. Design: Qualitative, critical theory paradigm. Participants: US medical school faculty (n = 8) and students (n = 9) were purposively sampled for knowledge of disability-related training based on known engagement in activities to advance disability-related medical education. Inclusion was limited to English language proficiency. Interventions: n/a. Approach: Data were collected through focus groups, hosted virtually with separate groups for faculty and medical students between September 2021 and February 2022. Each meeting was recorded, transcribed, and de-identified. Deductive and inductive coding schemes were applied by multiple coders until reaching thematic saturation. Key Results: Prominent themes revealed critical shortfalls in medical education, including (1) disability being omitted from standard curricula; (2) disability being framed as a problem within individuals; (3) pervasive discrimination against PWD in medicine; and (4) over-reliance on ad hoc faculty and student-led efforts to cultivate curricular change. Data also revealed multifactorial barriers to including disability training as part of US medical education, such as avoidance of personal and institutional responsibility, and permeations of ableism across social and training contexts. Conclusions: Medical education may perpetuate negative bias about disability through a hidden curriculum. Insufficient support from institutional and licensing authorities has stymied efforts to expand and improve disability-related training such that disability is not included in existing curricula focused on mitigating health care disparities — despite known vulnerabilities for PWD. Without improvements to disability-related curricular content, physicians will remain ill-equipped to care for the nation’s largest minority group.
AB - Background: Accounting for approximately 1 in 4 community-dwelling adults in the United States (US), people with disabilities (PWD) experience significant disparities in health care quality, access, and outcomes. At the same time, US physicians have reported feeling unprepared to care for PWD and have revealed significant negative bias about this population. Objective: To understand how physicians are trained to care for PWD in US medical schools. Design: Qualitative, critical theory paradigm. Participants: US medical school faculty (n = 8) and students (n = 9) were purposively sampled for knowledge of disability-related training based on known engagement in activities to advance disability-related medical education. Inclusion was limited to English language proficiency. Interventions: n/a. Approach: Data were collected through focus groups, hosted virtually with separate groups for faculty and medical students between September 2021 and February 2022. Each meeting was recorded, transcribed, and de-identified. Deductive and inductive coding schemes were applied by multiple coders until reaching thematic saturation. Key Results: Prominent themes revealed critical shortfalls in medical education, including (1) disability being omitted from standard curricula; (2) disability being framed as a problem within individuals; (3) pervasive discrimination against PWD in medicine; and (4) over-reliance on ad hoc faculty and student-led efforts to cultivate curricular change. Data also revealed multifactorial barriers to including disability training as part of US medical education, such as avoidance of personal and institutional responsibility, and permeations of ableism across social and training contexts. Conclusions: Medical education may perpetuate negative bias about disability through a hidden curriculum. Insufficient support from institutional and licensing authorities has stymied efforts to expand and improve disability-related training such that disability is not included in existing curricula focused on mitigating health care disparities — despite known vulnerabilities for PWD. Without improvements to disability-related curricular content, physicians will remain ill-equipped to care for the nation’s largest minority group.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217231995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85217231995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-024-09308-2
DO - 10.1007/s11606-024-09308-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 39815131
AN - SCOPUS:85217231995
SN - 0884-8734
JO - Journal of general internal medicine
JF - Journal of general internal medicine
ER -