The Geometric Optics Contribution to the Scattering from a Large Dense Dielectric Sphere

Hitoshi Inada, Martin A Plonus

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An analysis is presented for calculating the back-scattered fields of an electromagnetic plane wave by lossless dielectric spheres of arbitrary density. This method involves the Watson transformation which serves to split the exact Mie solution, given as an infinite series, into the geometrical optics fields and the diffracted fields. The former comes from the illuminated region of the sphere and may be obtained from the geometrical optics method. The latter comes from the shadow region and consists of two different types of surface waves. One is a “creeping wave” analogous to that of perfectly conducting spheres. The other is a wave which enters the sphere and emerges as a surface wave in the shadow region. This wave is unique to dielectric spheres and is the stronger of the two surface waves. In the widely used geometric optics methods it is assumed that the optics fields are the dominant contributors even though stationary rays which are not in the direction of backscatter must be added in to give a degree of agreement with the exact Mie series results. In this paper we derive the optics fields and show that they differ in some respects from those obtained by the geometric optics method. They are smaller than heretofore assumed and contribute negligibly to the backscatter in this particular range of ka (4–20). Using our rigorous approach we can show the diffracted fields to be the major contributors to the total backscatter. Numerical results for the backscattering cross sections using diffracted and optics fields, and optics fields alone will be presented for relative index of refraction of 1.6. The agreement between our results (diffracted and optics) and exact results from the Mie series is excellent. A subsequent paper will be concerned with the diffracted fields.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-99
Number of pages11
JournalIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
VolumeAP-18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1970

Fingerprint

Optics
optics
Scattering
scattering
Surface waves
surface waves
Geometrical optics
geometrical optics
Backscattering
Refraction
refraction
backscattering
rays
plane waves
electromagnetism
conduction
cross sections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

@article{d78a6f117dad471fbb347a7d3e7b13e1,
title = "The Geometric Optics Contribution to the Scattering from a Large Dense Dielectric Sphere",
abstract = "An analysis is presented for calculating the back-scattered fields of an electromagnetic plane wave by lossless dielectric spheres of arbitrary density. This method involves the Watson transformation which serves to split the exact Mie solution, given as an infinite series, into the geometrical optics fields and the diffracted fields. The former comes from the illuminated region of the sphere and may be obtained from the geometrical optics method. The latter comes from the shadow region and consists of two different types of surface waves. One is a “creeping wave” analogous to that of perfectly conducting spheres. The other is a wave which enters the sphere and emerges as a surface wave in the shadow region. This wave is unique to dielectric spheres and is the stronger of the two surface waves. In the widely used geometric optics methods it is assumed that the optics fields are the dominant contributors even though stationary rays which are not in the direction of backscatter must be added in to give a degree of agreement with the exact Mie series results. In this paper we derive the optics fields and show that they differ in some respects from those obtained by the geometric optics method. They are smaller than heretofore assumed and contribute negligibly to the backscatter in this particular range of ka (4–20). Using our rigorous approach we can show the diffracted fields to be the major contributors to the total backscatter. Numerical results for the backscattering cross sections using diffracted and optics fields, and optics fields alone will be presented for relative index of refraction of 1.6. The agreement between our results (diffracted and optics) and exact results from the Mie series is excellent. A subsequent paper will be concerned with the diffracted fields.",
author = "Hitoshi Inada and Plonus, {Martin A}",
year = "1970",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TAP.1970.1139624",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "AP-18",
pages = "89--99",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation",
issn = "0018-926X",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "1",

}

The Geometric Optics Contribution to the Scattering from a Large Dense Dielectric Sphere. / Inada, Hitoshi; Plonus, Martin A.

In: IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. AP-18, No. 1, 01.01.1970, p. 89-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Geometric Optics Contribution to the Scattering from a Large Dense Dielectric Sphere

AU - Inada, Hitoshi

AU - Plonus, Martin A

PY - 1970/1/1

Y1 - 1970/1/1

N2 - An analysis is presented for calculating the back-scattered fields of an electromagnetic plane wave by lossless dielectric spheres of arbitrary density. This method involves the Watson transformation which serves to split the exact Mie solution, given as an infinite series, into the geometrical optics fields and the diffracted fields. The former comes from the illuminated region of the sphere and may be obtained from the geometrical optics method. The latter comes from the shadow region and consists of two different types of surface waves. One is a “creeping wave” analogous to that of perfectly conducting spheres. The other is a wave which enters the sphere and emerges as a surface wave in the shadow region. This wave is unique to dielectric spheres and is the stronger of the two surface waves. In the widely used geometric optics methods it is assumed that the optics fields are the dominant contributors even though stationary rays which are not in the direction of backscatter must be added in to give a degree of agreement with the exact Mie series results. In this paper we derive the optics fields and show that they differ in some respects from those obtained by the geometric optics method. They are smaller than heretofore assumed and contribute negligibly to the backscatter in this particular range of ka (4–20). Using our rigorous approach we can show the diffracted fields to be the major contributors to the total backscatter. Numerical results for the backscattering cross sections using diffracted and optics fields, and optics fields alone will be presented for relative index of refraction of 1.6. The agreement between our results (diffracted and optics) and exact results from the Mie series is excellent. A subsequent paper will be concerned with the diffracted fields.

AB - An analysis is presented for calculating the back-scattered fields of an electromagnetic plane wave by lossless dielectric spheres of arbitrary density. This method involves the Watson transformation which serves to split the exact Mie solution, given as an infinite series, into the geometrical optics fields and the diffracted fields. The former comes from the illuminated region of the sphere and may be obtained from the geometrical optics method. The latter comes from the shadow region and consists of two different types of surface waves. One is a “creeping wave” analogous to that of perfectly conducting spheres. The other is a wave which enters the sphere and emerges as a surface wave in the shadow region. This wave is unique to dielectric spheres and is the stronger of the two surface waves. In the widely used geometric optics methods it is assumed that the optics fields are the dominant contributors even though stationary rays which are not in the direction of backscatter must be added in to give a degree of agreement with the exact Mie series results. In this paper we derive the optics fields and show that they differ in some respects from those obtained by the geometric optics method. They are smaller than heretofore assumed and contribute negligibly to the backscatter in this particular range of ka (4–20). Using our rigorous approach we can show the diffracted fields to be the major contributors to the total backscatter. Numerical results for the backscattering cross sections using diffracted and optics fields, and optics fields alone will be presented for relative index of refraction of 1.6. The agreement between our results (diffracted and optics) and exact results from the Mie series is excellent. A subsequent paper will be concerned with the diffracted fields.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0014728353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0014728353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TAP.1970.1139624

DO - 10.1109/TAP.1970.1139624

M3 - Letter

AN - SCOPUS:0014728353

VL - AP-18

SP - 89

EP - 99

JO - IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

JF - IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

SN - 0018-926X

IS - 1

ER -