The idea of rhetoric in the rhetoric of science

Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

A striking but insufficiently examined feature of the current revival of interest in rhetoric is its positioning primarily as a hermeneutic metadiscourse rather than as a substantive discourse practice. When one invokes metadiscourse to account for a discursive practice, what one hopes to achieve is minimally a “redescription” of the latter. Rhetoric has entered the orbit of general hermeneutics. This essay, divided into three parts, examines the cultural identity of rhetoric, the interpretive turn and rhetorical criticism, the politics of repression and recognition, the rhetoric of science as a discursive formation, communitarian and epistemic strategies, and the inventional strategy and humanist paradigm. The works of Michael Leff Allan G. Gross, John Angus Campbell, and Lawrence J. Prelli are critiqued.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)258-295
Number of pages38
JournalSouthern Communication Journal
Volume58
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The idea of rhetoric in the rhetoric of science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this