TY - JOUR
T1 - The immediate consequences of federal pretrial detention
AU - Didwania, Stephanie Holmes
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Law and Economics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - Unlike the cash-bail regimes that are prevalent in state courts, federal courts rarely use money bail as a condition of pretrial release. Nonetheless, this article presents evidence that pretrial release influences case outcomes for federal defendants. Using case data spanning 71 federal district courts, the article suggests that pretrial release reduces a defendant's sentence and increases the probability that they will receive a sentence below the recommended sentencing range. Pretrial release also appears to lessen the probability that a defendant will receive a mandatory minimum sentence when one is charged. The analysis exploits variation in magistrate judges' propensities to release defendants pending trial, which allows magistrate judge leniency to serve as an instrumental variable for pretrial release. The article also provides suggestive evidence that pretrial release affects case outcomes through two channels: first, by giving defendants the opportunity to present mitigating evidence at sentencing and second, by making it easier for defendants to earn a sentencing reduction by providing assistance to the government.
AB - Unlike the cash-bail regimes that are prevalent in state courts, federal courts rarely use money bail as a condition of pretrial release. Nonetheless, this article presents evidence that pretrial release influences case outcomes for federal defendants. Using case data spanning 71 federal district courts, the article suggests that pretrial release reduces a defendant's sentence and increases the probability that they will receive a sentence below the recommended sentencing range. Pretrial release also appears to lessen the probability that a defendant will receive a mandatory minimum sentence when one is charged. The analysis exploits variation in magistrate judges' propensities to release defendants pending trial, which allows magistrate judge leniency to serve as an instrumental variable for pretrial release. The article also provides suggestive evidence that pretrial release affects case outcomes through two channels: first, by giving defendants the opportunity to present mitigating evidence at sentencing and second, by making it easier for defendants to earn a sentencing reduction by providing assistance to the government.
KW - K14
KW - K42
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090541489&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090541489&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/aler/ahz012
DO - 10.1093/aler/ahz012
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85090541489
SN - 1465-7252
VL - 22
SP - 24
EP - 74
JO - American Law and Economics Review
JF - American Law and Economics Review
IS - 1
ER -