The immediate consequences of federal pretrial detention

Stephanie Holmes Didwania*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Unlike the cash-bail regimes that are prevalent in state courts, federal courts rarely use money bail as a condition of pretrial release. Nonetheless, this article presents evidence that pretrial release influences case outcomes for federal defendants. Using case data spanning 71 federal district courts, the article suggests that pretrial release reduces a defendant's sentence and increases the probability that they will receive a sentence below the recommended sentencing range. Pretrial release also appears to lessen the probability that a defendant will receive a mandatory minimum sentence when one is charged. The analysis exploits variation in magistrate judges' propensities to release defendants pending trial, which allows magistrate judge leniency to serve as an instrumental variable for pretrial release. The article also provides suggestive evidence that pretrial release affects case outcomes through two channels: first, by giving defendants the opportunity to present mitigating evidence at sentencing and second, by making it easier for defendants to earn a sentencing reduction by providing assistance to the government.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-74
Number of pages51
JournalAmerican Law and Economics Review
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2020

Keywords

  • K14
  • K42

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The immediate consequences of federal pretrial detention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this