A person’s level of education can affect their access to health care, and their health outcomes. Increasing rates of depression are another looming public health concern. Therefore, vulnerability is compounded for individuals who have a lower level of education and depression. Assessment of depressive symptoms is integral to many domains of health care including primary care and mental health specialty care. This investigation examined the degree to which education influences the psychometric properties of self-report items that measure depressive symptoms. This study was a secondary data analysis derived from three large internet panel studies. Together, the studies included the Beck Depression Inventory–II, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire, and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures of depression. Using a differential item functioning (DIF) approach, we found evidence of DIF such that some items on each of the questionnaires were flagged for DIF with effect sizes ranging from McFadden’s Pseudo R2 =.005 to.022. For example, results included several double-barreled questions flagged for DIF. Overall, questionnaires assessing depression vary in level of complexity, which interacts with the respondent’s level of education. Measurement of depression should include consideration of possible educational disparities, to identify people who may struggle with a written questionnaire, or may be subject to subtle psychometric biases associated with education.
- differential item functioning (DIF)
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Applied Psychology
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'The Impact of Education on Depression Assessment: Differential Item Functioning Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Taple, B. J. (Contributor), Chapman, R. (Creator), Schalet, B. D. (Creator), Brower, R. (Creator) & Griffith, J. W. (Creator), SAGE Journals, 2020