TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of race on the adjudication of sexual assault and other violent crimes
AU - Maxwell, Christopher D.
AU - Robinson, Amanda L.
AU - Post, Lori A.
PY - 2003/11/1
Y1 - 2003/11/1
N2 - This study assessed whether sexual assault offenders were differently adjudicated from other violent felons and to what extent any differences in adjudication decisions were explained by the defendant's race. Five court decisions were analyzed using a weighted sample of 41,151 cases adjudicated between 1990 and 1996 that were representative of cases in the seventy-five most populous United States counties. The results did not support the hypothesis that sexual assault cases were given, on average, more leniency than less serious violent offenses, however, various adjudication decisions for the four violent offenses were moderated by the defendant's race. Interaction models showed minorities were treated more punitively compared to Whites when they were charged with an assault, robbery, or murder, but they were treated more leniently when they were charged with a sexual assault. Explanatory models that accounted for the differential processing of minorities that were disproportionately lenient or punitive, depending on the crime, are discussed.
AB - This study assessed whether sexual assault offenders were differently adjudicated from other violent felons and to what extent any differences in adjudication decisions were explained by the defendant's race. Five court decisions were analyzed using a weighted sample of 41,151 cases adjudicated between 1990 and 1996 that were representative of cases in the seventy-five most populous United States counties. The results did not support the hypothesis that sexual assault cases were given, on average, more leniency than less serious violent offenses, however, various adjudication decisions for the four violent offenses were moderated by the defendant's race. Interaction models showed minorities were treated more punitively compared to Whites when they were charged with an assault, robbery, or murder, but they were treated more leniently when they were charged with a sexual assault. Explanatory models that accounted for the differential processing of minorities that were disproportionately lenient or punitive, depending on the crime, are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242679649&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242679649&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2003.08.005
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2003.08.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0242679649
SN - 0047-2352
VL - 31
SP - 523
EP - 538
JO - Journal of Criminal Justice
JF - Journal of Criminal Justice
IS - 6
ER -