The Impact of Stricter Guidelines on Post-Interview Contact, Restricted Interview Topics and Differences by Gender in the Urology Match

Introduction:In response to studies showing high rates of program initiated post-interview contact and the use of discriminatory personal questions on topics such as age, intent for children, and religion or political preferences during interviews the Society of Academic Urologists and the American Urological Association published revised guidelines for the 2020 Urology Match. This study assessed the impact of these changes on the applicant experience and prevalence of restricted questions.Methods:A total of 361 applicants to a single urology residency program were sent an anonymous 20-question survey about post-interview program contact and restricted interview questions. The 20-question survey used branching logic with followup questions based on initial responses.Results:A total of 100 survey responses were received. Of respondents 2% reported unsolicited program initiated post-interview contact and no Match commitments were reported. Among respondents 36% felt they were asked an inappropriate question during an interview, female applicants more commonly than males (50% vs 25%, p=0.01). When asked about specific restricted topics, 98% of respondents reported encountering at least 1. Of the restricted topics asked women more frequently encountered questions about their intent for children (27.3% vs 10.7%, p=0.032) and other programs to which they applied (100% vs 91%, p=0.04).Conclusions:Following changes to the guidelines for the 2020 Urology Match unsolicited program initiated post-interview contact rates were lower than reported in previous studies. However, applicants continue to encounter restricted topics, and females disproportionately so, demonstrating that continued work must be done to decrease discrimination and bias throughout the interview process.