The Island (in)sensitivity of sluicing and sprouting

Masaya Yoshida, Jiyeon Lee, Michael Walsh Dickey

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

5 Scopus citations


Ellipsis constructions present many challenges to incremental sentence processing. One challenge is that most partial sentences that are compatible with ellipsis continuations are also compatible with non-ellipsis continuations. Example (1) is a case in point. This partial sentence is compatible with the ellipsis of the material following the wh-phrase in an embedded interrogative as in (1a) (a construction known as sluicing in the syntax literature), and various non-ellipsis continuations such as those in (1b) and (1c). John was writing something, but I don't know what … a. Ellipsis b…he was writing c… motivates him to write so much. Furthermore, there does not seem to be an obvious cue that can tell the parser whether ellipsis follows or not. In other words, environments where ellipsis is typically found show structural ambiguity. Therefore, there is always a danger that inducing ellipsis may turn out to be an incorrect analysis, and it may require structural reanalysis. Such reanalysis is costly and is avoided by the parser whenever possible (Schneider and Phillips 2001; Sturt et al. 2001). This in turn suggests that it is always safer for the parser to choose a non-ellipsis structure, since it can rely on bottom-up information in non-ellipsis continuations. If this is the case, the parser should choose ellipsis if and only if bottom-up information confirms that ellipsis is there. That is, the parser should not induce or infer ellipsis incrementally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationExperimental Syntax and Island Effects
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9781139035309
ISBN (Print)9781107008700
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences


Dive into the research topics of 'The Island (in)sensitivity of sluicing and sprouting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this