TY - JOUR
T1 - The isometric functional capacity of muscles that cross the elbow
AU - Murray, Wendy M.
AU - Buchanan, Thomas S.
AU - Delp, Scott L.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Allison Arnold, Mahidhar Durbhakula, and David Wyles for assistance with data collection and analysis, Dr. Randolph Perkins for his assistance in the anatomy lab, and the Orthopaedics Department of Northwestern University for the use of the anatomy lab. We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Andrew Krylow (1960–1998) for designing the laser system. This work supported by NSF BES-9257229, NIH, and an NIDRR Training Grant.
PY - 2000/8
Y1 - 2000/8
N2 - We hypothesized that muscles crossing the elbow have fundamental differences in their capacity for excursion, force generation, and moment generation due to differences in their architecture, moment arm, and the combination of their architecture and moment arm. Muscle fascicle length, sarcomere length, pennation angle, mass, and tendon displacement with elbow flexion were measured for the major elbow muscles in 10 upper extremity specimens. Optimal fascicle length, physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA), moment arm, operating range on the force-length curve, and moment-generating capacity were estimated from these data. Brachioradialis and pronator teres had the longest (17.7cm) and shortest (5.5cm) fascicles, respectively. Triceps brachii (combined heads) and brachioradialis had the greatest (14.9cm2) and smallest (1.2cm2) PCSAs, respectively. Despite a comparable fascicle length, long head of biceps brachii operates over a broader range of the force-length curve (length change=56% of optimal length, 12.8cm) than the long head of triceps brachii (length change=28% of optimal length, 12.7cm) because of its larger moment arm (4.7cm vs. 2.3cm). Although brachioradialis has a small PCSA, it has a relatively large moment-generating capacity (6.8cm3) due to its large moment arm (average peak=7.7cm). These results emphasize the need to consider the interplay of architecture and moment arm when evaluating the functional capabilities of a muscle. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.
AB - We hypothesized that muscles crossing the elbow have fundamental differences in their capacity for excursion, force generation, and moment generation due to differences in their architecture, moment arm, and the combination of their architecture and moment arm. Muscle fascicle length, sarcomere length, pennation angle, mass, and tendon displacement with elbow flexion were measured for the major elbow muscles in 10 upper extremity specimens. Optimal fascicle length, physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA), moment arm, operating range on the force-length curve, and moment-generating capacity were estimated from these data. Brachioradialis and pronator teres had the longest (17.7cm) and shortest (5.5cm) fascicles, respectively. Triceps brachii (combined heads) and brachioradialis had the greatest (14.9cm2) and smallest (1.2cm2) PCSAs, respectively. Despite a comparable fascicle length, long head of biceps brachii operates over a broader range of the force-length curve (length change=56% of optimal length, 12.8cm) than the long head of triceps brachii (length change=28% of optimal length, 12.7cm) because of its larger moment arm (4.7cm vs. 2.3cm). Although brachioradialis has a small PCSA, it has a relatively large moment-generating capacity (6.8cm3) due to its large moment arm (average peak=7.7cm). These results emphasize the need to consider the interplay of architecture and moment arm when evaluating the functional capabilities of a muscle. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.
KW - Elbow
KW - Moment arms
KW - Muscle architecture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034030080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034030080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00051-8
DO - 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00051-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 10828324
AN - SCOPUS:0034030080
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 33
SP - 943
EP - 952
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
IS - 8
ER -