The joint hierarchical structure of adolescent personality pathology: Converging evidence from two approaches to measurement

Shauna C. Kushner, Jennifer L. Tackett, Barbara De Clercq

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To examine the joint hierarchical structure of two measures of adolescent personality pathology within a community sample of Canadian adolescents. Method: Self-reported data on demographic information and pathological personality traits were obtained from 144 youth (Mage=16.08 years, SD = 1.30). Personality pathology was measured using the youth-version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP-Y; Linde, Stringer, Simms, & Clark, in press) and the Dimensional Personality Symptom Item Pool (DIPSI; De Clercq, De Fruyt, Van Leeuwen, & Mervielde, 2006). Lower-order scales were subjected to structural hierarchical analyses. Results: Scales from the two measures were complementary in defining higher-order traits. Traits at the 4-factor level of the hierarchy (Need for Approval, Disagreeableness, Detachment, and Compulsivity) showed similarities and differences with previous results in adults. Conclusions: The current investigation integrated top-down and bottom-up measures for a comprehensive account of the higher-order hierarchy of adolescent personality pathology. Results are discussed in the context of convergence across approaches and in comparison with previous findings in adult samples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-205
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume22
Issue number3
StatePublished - Aug 1 2013

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Personality hierarchy
  • Personality pathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The joint hierarchical structure of adolescent personality pathology: Converging evidence from two approaches to measurement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this