The logic of design research

Matthew W. Easterday*, Daniel G. Rees Lewis, Elizabeth M. Gerber

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Since the first descriptions of design research (DR), there have been calls to better define it to increase its rigour. Yet five uncertainties remain: (1) the processes for conducting DR, (2) how DR differs from other forms of research, (3) how DR differs from design, (4) the products of DR, and (5) why DR can answer certain research questions more effectively than other methodologies. To resolve these uncertainties, we define educational design research as a meta-methodology conducted by education researchers to create practical interventions and theoretical design models through a design process of focusing, understanding, defining, conceiving, building, testing, and presenting, that recursively nests other research processes to iteratively search for empirical solutions to practical problems of human learning. By better articulating the logic of DR, researchers can more effectively craft, communicate, replicate, and teach DR as a useful and defensible research methodology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-160
Number of pages30
JournalLearning: Research and Practice
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2018

Keywords

  • Design-based research
  • design practice
  • design research
  • methodology
  • theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The logic of design research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this