The microendoscopic decompression of lumbar stenosis: A review of the current literature and clinical results

Albert P. Wong, Zachary A. Smith, Rohan R. Lall, Lacey E. Bresnahan, Richard G. Fessler*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Lumbar stenosis is a well-defined pathologic condition with excellent surgical outcomes. Empiric evidence as well as randomized, prospective trials has demonstrated the superior efficacy of surgery compared to medical management for lumbar stenosis. Traditionally, lumbar stenosis is decompressed with open laminectomies. This involves removal of the spinous process, lamina, and the posterior musculoligamentous complex (posterior tension band). This approach provides excellent improvement in symptoms, but is also associated with potential postoperative spinal instability. This may result in subsequent need for spinal fusion. Advances in technology have enabled the application of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) as an acceptable alternative to open lumbar decompression. Recent studies have shown similar to improved perioperative outcomes when comparing MISS to open decompression for lumbar stenosis. A literature review of MISS for decompression of lumbar stenosis with tubular retractors was performed to evaluate the outcomes of this modern surgical technique. In addition, a discussion of the advantages and limitations of this technique is provided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number325095
JournalMinimally Invasive Surgery
Volume2012
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The microendoscopic decompression of lumbar stenosis: A review of the current literature and clinical results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this