Abstract
This paper reports results from the randomized evaluation of a group-lending microcredit program in Hyderabad, India. A lender worked in 52 randomly selected neighborhoods, leading to an 8.4 percentage point increase in takeup of microcredit. Small business investment and profits of preexisting businesses increased, but consumption did not significantly increase. Durable goods expenditure increased, while "temptation goods" expenditure declined. We found no significant changes in health, education, or women's empowerment. Two years later, after control areas had gained access to microcredit but households in treatment area had borrowed for longer and in larger amounts, very few significant differences persist.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 22-53 |
Number of pages | 32 |
Journal | American Economic Journal: Applied Economics |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2015 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Replication data for: The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation
Banerjee, A. (Creator), Duflo, E. (Creator), Glennerster, R. (Creator) & Kinnan, C. (Creator), ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research, 2015
DOI: 10.3886/e113599v1-147521, https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/113599/version/V1/view?path=/openicpsr/113599/fcr:versions/V1/2013-0533_data--TO-SUBMIT-&type=folder
Dataset