The Misquantification of Probative Value

D. H. Kaye, Jonathan J. Koehler*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

D. Davis and W. C. Follette (2002) purport to show that when "the base rate" for a crime is low, the probative value of " characteristics known to be strongly associated with the crime ... will be virtually nil." Their analysis rests on the choice of an arbitrary and inapposite measure of the probative value of evidence. When a more suitable metric is used (e.g., a likelihood ratio), it becomes clear that evidence they would dismiss as devoid of probative value is relevant and diagnostic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)645-659
Number of pages15
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2003

Keywords

  • Evidence
  • Inference
  • Probative value

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Misquantification of Probative Value'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this