The Northwestern University Twin Study XV: Rationales for a standard of care in compromised twin pregnancies

J. P. Minogue, Ralph K Tamura, L. G. Keith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


Current antenatal technologies have improved the obstetrician's ability to assess fetal well-being as well as to diagnose fetal compromise. These technologies have given rise to very difficult ethical issues in the management of compromised twin pregnancies: for example, a choice must be made between putting a healthy twin at risk due to preterm delivery for the sake of a compromised cotwin or of allowing the compromised twin to die in order to buy time for the healthy twin. Though each case is unique, good medical practice requires a standard of care by which consistent patient management can be proposed. In the pluralistic environment of Northwestern Memorial Hospital, our staff has favored a standard of care based on patient autonomy. This approach demands: 1) a practitioner who offers a thorough explanation of the diagnosis and possible treatment approaches; 2) time for the patient and her partner to assimilate this information and test treatment options against their personal value system; 3) a third, but disinterestered, party to facilitate patient understanding and value clarification; 4) a practitioner either willing to support the patient's decisions or refer her to another practitioner who will.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-382
Number of pages4
JournalActa Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Northwestern University Twin Study XV: Rationales for a standard of care in compromised twin pregnancies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this