The NQF Scientific Methods Panel: Enhancing the Review and Endorsement Process for Performance Measures

David R. Nerenz*, David Cella, Lacy Fabian, Eugene Nuccio, John Bott, J. Matt Austin, Sam Simon, Jack Needleman, Karen Johnson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the summer of 2017, the National Quality Forum (NQF) announced the formation of a Scientific Methods Panel (hereafter referred to as “the Panel”) as part of a redesign of its endorsement process. NQF created the Panel in response to stakeholder request during a Kaizen improvement event held in May 2017. Given the Panel’s role in the endorsement of performance measures used in national payment programs, the objective of this article is to describe the work of the Panel, and to describe its function in the larger context of the NQF measure endorsement process and in the measurement enterprise writ large. This article also serves as an introduction to a series of planned white papers being authored by the panel on specific technical issues in the area of health care performance measurement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)458-464
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Quality
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • National Quality Forum
  • measure reliability
  • measure validity
  • quality measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The NQF Scientific Methods Panel: Enhancing the Review and Endorsement Process for Performance Measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this