The Ocular Trauma Score Underestimates Visual Recovery for the Most Severe Open-Globe Injuries

Purpose: To compare visual outcomes after open-globe injury (OGI) with those predicted by the Ocular Trauma Score (OTS), and to investigate the effect of treatment with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Subjects: Patients presenting with OGI to an academic United States ophthalmology department from 2017 to 2020. Methods: Best-corrected visual acuity (VA) measurements at the most recent follow-up were compared with final VA predicted by the OTS, based on preoperative injury characteristics. The most recently measured VA of patients treated with PPV during initial OGI repair (primary PPV group) was compared with patients treated with PPV after initial OGI repair (secondary PPV group) and patients never treated with PPV (No PPV group). Main Outcome Measures: Best-corrected VA in the injured eye at last follow-up; secondary outcome measures included the occurrence of vitreous hemorrhage at any time, occurrence of retinal detachment at any time, rates of additional surgery, and rates of enucleation. Results: One-hundred and thirty-three subjects with OGI were identified and analyzed. The overall rate of PPV was 32%. Predictors of worse VA at last follow-up included older age (P = 0.047) and worse presenting VA (P < 0.001). Visual acuity outcomes for eyes in OTS categories 2 to 5 did not significantly differ from OTS predictions. However, eyes in OTS category 1 had a higher likelihood of last follow-up VA of light perception (LP) to hand motion (46% in the study cohort vs. 15% predicted by the OTS, P = 0.004) and a lower likelihood of no LP (33% vs. 74%, P < 0.001). The secondary PPV group had the worst VA at presentation among the 3 groups (P = 0.016), but VA at last follow-up did not significantly differ between the study groups (P = 0.338). Conclusions: The most severe OGIs (i.e., OTS category 1) had better visual outcomes than predicted by the published OTS expectations, and secondary PPV was associated with significant visual improvement despite poor prognostic predictions. Evaluation by a vitreoretinal surgeon should be considered for all patients with severe OGI, especially those in OTS category 1. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.