La politique de punition et le siège de Sarajevo

Translated title of the contribution: The politics of punishment and the siege of Sarajevo

Sanja Kutnjak Ivkovich, John Hagan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Liberal legalism non-controversially advocates procedural fairness and due process in institutions such as the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY). The visible conflicts come with the ebb and flow of international jurisdictional claims, suspicions of racial/ethnic and cultural biases in deliberations and decisions, prioritization of purposes in sentencing decisions, and the intrusion of institutional and international political debates into the liberal legal agenda. These conflicts threaten to create a legitimacy deficit in diffuse support for the ICTY. We examine these conflicts within the context of two surveys about the ICTY conducted in Sarajevo in 2000 and 2003. The results indicate that the citizens of Sarajevo increasingly believe that the ICTY is politically influenced by internationally appointed judges, peaking with the sentencing of Stanislav Galic for the siege of Sarajevo. This conflict focuses on issues of substantive rather than procedural justice and is increasingly articulated as a rejection of international political intervention that subverts the need for a local sense of justice. This may be a sequence of political conflict and disillusionment that is as inevitable as it is unavoidable.

Translated title of the contributionThe politics of punishment and the siege of Sarajevo
Original languageFrench
JournalActes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales
Issue number173
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'The politics of punishment and the siege of Sarajevo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this