The possibilities are assessable: Using an evidence based framework to identify assessment opportunities in library technology departments

Rick Stoddart, Evviva Weinraub Lajoie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective - This study aimed to identify assessment opportunities and stakeholder connections in an emerging technologies department. Such departments are often overlooked by traditional assessment measures because they do not appear to provide direct support for student learning. Methods - The study consisted of a content analysis of departmental records and of weekly activity journals which were completed by staff in the Emerging Technologies and Services department in a U.S. academic library. The findings were supported by interviews with team members to provide richer data. An evidence based framework was used to identify stakeholder interactions where impactful evidence might be gathered to support decision-making and to communicate value. Results - The study identified a lack of available assessable evidence with some types of interaction, outreach activity, and responsibilities of staff being under-reported in departmental documentation. A modified logic model was developed to further identify assessment opportunities and reporting processes. Conclusion - The authors conclude that an evidence based practice research approach offers an engaging and illuminative framework to identify department alignment to strategic initiatives and learning goals. In order to provide a more complete picture of library impact and value, new and robust methods of assessing library technology departments must be developed and employed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-43
Number of pages15
JournalEvidence Based Library and Information Practice
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The possibilities are assessable: Using an evidence based framework to identify assessment opportunities in library technology departments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this