TY - JOUR
T1 - The post-stroke upper limb improvement effort survey (IMPETUS)
T2 - a survey of individuals with chronic stroke
AU - Sullivan, Jane E.
AU - Drogos, Justin
AU - Carmona, Carolina
AU - Yao, Jun
N1 - Funding Information:
The survey was administered by Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). REDCap is supported at the Feinberg School of Medicine by the Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health?s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant Number [UL1TR001422]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors would like to acknowledge the Doctor of Physical Therapy Students who worked on this project, including; Jessica Minton, PT, DPT; Keely McNutt, PT, DPT; Annie Rockert, PT, DPT; Morgan Steele, PT, DPT; Emma Taylor, PT, DPT; and Kathryn Webb, PT, DPT; the Physical Therapists who provided feedback on the early review of the survey, and the individuals with stroke who helped review the survey and who participated in the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2019/11/17
Y1 - 2019/11/17
N2 - Background: There is a considerable literature on arm/hand dysfunction post stroke, but little information on the participants’ opinions about perceived and desired arm/hand strength, recovery, and function. Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the perceptions of individuals with stroke about arm/hand function and training devices. Methods: A 69-item survey was developed addressing: activity before and after stroke, involved arm/hand function, willingness to use a training device, and important device characteristics. The survey included items from the Hand Function and Strength Subscales of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). Face validity was established by physical therapists and individuals with stroke. The survey was administered via phone and online. Results: 852 registry participants were recruited. Ninety-seven responded; 83 completed the survey. Subjects were 51 males, 31 females; mean age: 65 (25–95); meantime since stroke: 13 years (1–34; SD 6.678). There was a statistically significant difference between perceived and desired arm/hand strength, recovery, and function p<0.0001. Impairment factors, such as weakness and spasticity were greater barriers to recovery than socio-economic ones. Most participants (94%) were willing to use a device; functional gains during/following use were the most important characteristics. Limitations: Participants had greater arm impairment and were more chronic than other studies. Conclusions: Participants desired more arm/hand strength, function, and recovery that they perceived they had achieved. Impairment–level factors posed more barriers to arm recovery than socioeconomic ones. Most participants were interested in using arm/hand training devices; the most important device characteristic is functional gain.
AB - Background: There is a considerable literature on arm/hand dysfunction post stroke, but little information on the participants’ opinions about perceived and desired arm/hand strength, recovery, and function. Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the perceptions of individuals with stroke about arm/hand function and training devices. Methods: A 69-item survey was developed addressing: activity before and after stroke, involved arm/hand function, willingness to use a training device, and important device characteristics. The survey included items from the Hand Function and Strength Subscales of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). Face validity was established by physical therapists and individuals with stroke. The survey was administered via phone and online. Results: 852 registry participants were recruited. Ninety-seven responded; 83 completed the survey. Subjects were 51 males, 31 females; mean age: 65 (25–95); meantime since stroke: 13 years (1–34; SD 6.678). There was a statistically significant difference between perceived and desired arm/hand strength, recovery, and function p<0.0001. Impairment factors, such as weakness and spasticity were greater barriers to recovery than socio-economic ones. Most participants (94%) were willing to use a device; functional gains during/following use were the most important characteristics. Limitations: Participants had greater arm impairment and were more chronic than other studies. Conclusions: Participants desired more arm/hand strength, function, and recovery that they perceived they had achieved. Impairment–level factors posed more barriers to arm recovery than socioeconomic ones. Most participants were interested in using arm/hand training devices; the most important device characteristic is functional gain.
KW - Stroke
KW - arm function
KW - participatory research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070443279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070443279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10749357.2019.1647649
DO - 10.1080/10749357.2019.1647649
M3 - Article
C2 - 31386604
AN - SCOPUS:85070443279
SN - 1074-9357
VL - 26
SP - 608
EP - 620
JO - Topics in stroke rehabilitation
JF - Topics in stroke rehabilitation
IS - 8
ER -