THE PREAPPEAL CONFERENCE AND EFFECTIVE JUSTICE

Jerry Goldman

doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.1979.tb00182.x

THE PREAPPEAL CONFERENCE AND EFFECTIVE JUSTICE

Jerry Goldman^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Political Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Appellate courts—both state and federal—have experienced dramatic increases in court business since 1960. A popular policy to meet this demand has been to encourage litigants to end their appeals short of decision by the judges. Few of these programs have been evaluated; and of those few the evidence is either insufficient to support claims of effectiveness, or demonstrate that some preappeal procedures do not work.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	101-120
Number of pages	20
Journal	Law & Policy
Volume	1
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1979.tb00182.x
State	Published - Jan 1 1979

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sociology and Political Science
Law

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1467-9930.1979.tb00182.x

Cite this

@article{74da209840de4676a9e007ae71573026,

title = "THE PREAPPEAL CONFERENCE AND EFFECTIVE JUSTICE",

abstract = "Appellate courts—both state and federal—have experienced dramatic increases in court business since 1960. A popular policy to meet this demand has been to encourage litigants to end their appeals short of decision by the judges. Few of these programs have been evaluated; and of those few the evidence is either insufficient to support claims of effectiveness, or demonstrate that some preappeal procedures do not work.",

author = "Jerry Goldman",

year = "1979",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9930.1979.tb00182.x",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "1",

pages = "101--120",

journal = "Law & Policy",

issn = "0265-8240",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - THE PREAPPEAL CONFERENCE AND EFFECTIVE JUSTICE

AU - Goldman, Jerry

PY - 1979/1/1

Y1 - 1979/1/1

N2 - Appellate courts—both state and federal—have experienced dramatic increases in court business since 1960. A popular policy to meet this demand has been to encourage litigants to end their appeals short of decision by the judges. Few of these programs have been evaluated; and of those few the evidence is either insufficient to support claims of effectiveness, or demonstrate that some preappeal procedures do not work.

AB - Appellate courts—both state and federal—have experienced dramatic increases in court business since 1960. A popular policy to meet this demand has been to encourage litigants to end their appeals short of decision by the judges. Few of these programs have been evaluated; and of those few the evidence is either insufficient to support claims of effectiveness, or demonstrate that some preappeal procedures do not work.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994930358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994930358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1979.tb00182.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1979.tb00182.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84994930358

SN - 0265-8240

VL - 1

SP - 101

EP - 120

JO - Law & Policy

JF - Law & Policy

IS - 1

ER -

THE PREAPPEAL CONFERENCE AND EFFECTIVE JUSTICE

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this