The prognostic significance of first myocardial infarction type (Q wave versus non-Q wave) and Q wave location

J. Benhorin, A. J. Moss, D. Oakes, F. Marcus, H. Greenberg, E. M. Dwyer, S. Algeo, E. Hahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The prognostic significance of the type of first acute myocardial infarction (Q wave versus non-Q wave) and Q wave location (anterior versus inferoposterior) was determined from a multicenter data base involving 777 placebo-treated patients who were participants in the Multicenter Diltiazem Post-Infarction Trial. There were 224 patients (29%) with a non-Q wave infarction, 326 (42%) with an inferoposterior Q wave infarction and 227 (29%) with an anterior Q wave infarction. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in patients with an anterior Q wave infarction than in the other two groups (anterior Q wave 0.39; inferior Q wave 0.52; non-Q wave 0.53). Nevertheless, the total cardiac mortality rate during the follow-up period (average 25 months per patient) was only marginally higher (p = 0.42) in the anterior Q wave group (8.4%) than in the other two groups (inferoposterior Q wave 7.1%; non-Q wave 6.3%). The total first recurrent cardiac event was somewhat higher (p = 0.08) in the anterior Q wave group (18.1%) than in the other two groups (inferoposterior Q wave 11.7%; non-Q wave 15.6%). Survivorship analyses extending over 3 years revealed that electrocardiographic classification of the type of first infarction and Q wave location did not make significant independent contributions to the risk of postinfarction cardiac death or first recurrent cardiac event, either before or after adjustment for baseline clinical variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1201-1207
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

Infarction
Myocardial Infarction
Diltiazem
Stroke Volume
Survival Rate
Placebos
Databases
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Benhorin, J. ; Moss, A. J. ; Oakes, D. ; Marcus, F. ; Greenberg, H. ; Dwyer, E. M. ; Algeo, S. ; Hahn, E. / The prognostic significance of first myocardial infarction type (Q wave versus non-Q wave) and Q wave location. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1990 ; Vol. 15, No. 6. pp. 1201-1207.
@article{7a9ea2958242409d90defb5cd9dc3266,
title = "The prognostic significance of first myocardial infarction type (Q wave versus non-Q wave) and Q wave location",
abstract = "The prognostic significance of the type of first acute myocardial infarction (Q wave versus non-Q wave) and Q wave location (anterior versus inferoposterior) was determined from a multicenter data base involving 777 placebo-treated patients who were participants in the Multicenter Diltiazem Post-Infarction Trial. There were 224 patients (29{\%}) with a non-Q wave infarction, 326 (42{\%}) with an inferoposterior Q wave infarction and 227 (29{\%}) with an anterior Q wave infarction. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in patients with an anterior Q wave infarction than in the other two groups (anterior Q wave 0.39; inferior Q wave 0.52; non-Q wave 0.53). Nevertheless, the total cardiac mortality rate during the follow-up period (average 25 months per patient) was only marginally higher (p = 0.42) in the anterior Q wave group (8.4{\%}) than in the other two groups (inferoposterior Q wave 7.1{\%}; non-Q wave 6.3{\%}). The total first recurrent cardiac event was somewhat higher (p = 0.08) in the anterior Q wave group (18.1{\%}) than in the other two groups (inferoposterior Q wave 11.7{\%}; non-Q wave 15.6{\%}). Survivorship analyses extending over 3 years revealed that electrocardiographic classification of the type of first infarction and Q wave location did not make significant independent contributions to the risk of postinfarction cardiac death or first recurrent cardiac event, either before or after adjustment for baseline clinical variables.",
author = "J. Benhorin and Moss, {A. J.} and D. Oakes and F. Marcus and H. Greenberg and Dwyer, {E. M.} and S. Algeo and E. Hahn",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0735-1097(10)80001-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1201--1207",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

The prognostic significance of first myocardial infarction type (Q wave versus non-Q wave) and Q wave location. / Benhorin, J.; Moss, A. J.; Oakes, D.; Marcus, F.; Greenberg, H.; Dwyer, E. M.; Algeo, S.; Hahn, E.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 15, No. 6, 01.01.1990, p. 1201-1207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The prognostic significance of first myocardial infarction type (Q wave versus non-Q wave) and Q wave location

AU - Benhorin, J.

AU - Moss, A. J.

AU - Oakes, D.

AU - Marcus, F.

AU - Greenberg, H.

AU - Dwyer, E. M.

AU - Algeo, S.

AU - Hahn, E.

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - The prognostic significance of the type of first acute myocardial infarction (Q wave versus non-Q wave) and Q wave location (anterior versus inferoposterior) was determined from a multicenter data base involving 777 placebo-treated patients who were participants in the Multicenter Diltiazem Post-Infarction Trial. There were 224 patients (29%) with a non-Q wave infarction, 326 (42%) with an inferoposterior Q wave infarction and 227 (29%) with an anterior Q wave infarction. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in patients with an anterior Q wave infarction than in the other two groups (anterior Q wave 0.39; inferior Q wave 0.52; non-Q wave 0.53). Nevertheless, the total cardiac mortality rate during the follow-up period (average 25 months per patient) was only marginally higher (p = 0.42) in the anterior Q wave group (8.4%) than in the other two groups (inferoposterior Q wave 7.1%; non-Q wave 6.3%). The total first recurrent cardiac event was somewhat higher (p = 0.08) in the anterior Q wave group (18.1%) than in the other two groups (inferoposterior Q wave 11.7%; non-Q wave 15.6%). Survivorship analyses extending over 3 years revealed that electrocardiographic classification of the type of first infarction and Q wave location did not make significant independent contributions to the risk of postinfarction cardiac death or first recurrent cardiac event, either before or after adjustment for baseline clinical variables.

AB - The prognostic significance of the type of first acute myocardial infarction (Q wave versus non-Q wave) and Q wave location (anterior versus inferoposterior) was determined from a multicenter data base involving 777 placebo-treated patients who were participants in the Multicenter Diltiazem Post-Infarction Trial. There were 224 patients (29%) with a non-Q wave infarction, 326 (42%) with an inferoposterior Q wave infarction and 227 (29%) with an anterior Q wave infarction. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in patients with an anterior Q wave infarction than in the other two groups (anterior Q wave 0.39; inferior Q wave 0.52; non-Q wave 0.53). Nevertheless, the total cardiac mortality rate during the follow-up period (average 25 months per patient) was only marginally higher (p = 0.42) in the anterior Q wave group (8.4%) than in the other two groups (inferoposterior Q wave 7.1%; non-Q wave 6.3%). The total first recurrent cardiac event was somewhat higher (p = 0.08) in the anterior Q wave group (18.1%) than in the other two groups (inferoposterior Q wave 11.7%; non-Q wave 15.6%). Survivorship analyses extending over 3 years revealed that electrocardiographic classification of the type of first infarction and Q wave location did not make significant independent contributions to the risk of postinfarction cardiac death or first recurrent cardiac event, either before or after adjustment for baseline clinical variables.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025273747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025273747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0735-1097(10)80001-4

DO - 10.1016/S0735-1097(10)80001-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 2184180

AN - SCOPUS:0025273747

VL - 15

SP - 1201

EP - 1207

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 6

ER -