TY - JOUR
T1 - The promises and pitfalls of genoeconomics
AU - Benjamin, Daniel J.
AU - Cesarini, David
AU - Chabris, Christopher F.
AU - Glaeser, Edward L.
AU - Laibson, David I.
AU - Gunason, Vilmundur
AU - Harris, Tamara B.
AU - Launer, Lenore J.
AU - Purcell, Shaun
AU - Smith, Albert Vernon
AU - Johannesson, Magnus
AU - Magnusson, Patrik K E
AU - Beauchamp, Jonathan P.
AU - Christakis, Nicholas A.
AU - Atwood, Craig S.
AU - Hebert, Benjamin
AU - Freese, Jeremy
AU - Hauser, Robert M.
AU - Hauser, Taissa S.
AU - Grankvist, Alexander
AU - Hultman, Christina M.
AU - Lichtenstein, Paul
PY - 2012/7
Y1 - 2012/7
N2 - This article reviews existing research at the intersection of genetics and economics, presents some new findings that illustrate the state of genoeconomics research, and surveys the prospects of this emerging field. Twin studies suggest that economic outcomes and preferences, once corrected for measurement error, appear to be about as heritable as many medical conditions and personality traits. Consistent with this pattern, we present new evidence on the heritability of permanent income and wealth. Turning to genetic association studies, we survey the main ways that the direct measurement of genetic variation across individuals is likely to contribute to economics, and we outline the challenges that have slowed progress in making these contributions. The most urgent problem facing researchers in this field is that most existing efforts to find associations between genetic variation and economic behavior are based on samples that are too small to ensure adequate statistical power. This has led to many false positives in the literature. We suggest a number of possible strategies to improve and remedy this problem: (a) pooling data sets, (b) using statistical techniques that exploit the greater information content of many genes jointly, and (c) focusing on economically relevant traits that are most proximate to known biological mechanisms.
AB - This article reviews existing research at the intersection of genetics and economics, presents some new findings that illustrate the state of genoeconomics research, and surveys the prospects of this emerging field. Twin studies suggest that economic outcomes and preferences, once corrected for measurement error, appear to be about as heritable as many medical conditions and personality traits. Consistent with this pattern, we present new evidence on the heritability of permanent income and wealth. Turning to genetic association studies, we survey the main ways that the direct measurement of genetic variation across individuals is likely to contribute to economics, and we outline the challenges that have slowed progress in making these contributions. The most urgent problem facing researchers in this field is that most existing efforts to find associations between genetic variation and economic behavior are based on samples that are too small to ensure adequate statistical power. This has led to many false positives in the literature. We suggest a number of possible strategies to improve and remedy this problem: (a) pooling data sets, (b) using statistical techniques that exploit the greater information content of many genes jointly, and (c) focusing on economically relevant traits that are most proximate to known biological mechanisms.
KW - GWAS
KW - genetics
KW - heritability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861439043&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861439043&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110939
DO - 10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110939
M3 - Article
C2 - 23482589
AN - SCOPUS:84861439043
SN - 1941-1383
VL - 4
SP - 627
EP - 662
JO - Annual Review of Economics
JF - Annual Review of Economics
ER -