The Quinlan case revisited.

Joel Frader*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

...The point is that although physicians and hospitals (and their legal counsel) certainly feared in the 1970s and still fear prosecution and civil liability (and perhaps to an unreasonable degree), neither the complex psychosocial and economic nor the equally complex philosophical questions surrounding stopping artificial life support were settled at the time of the Quinlan case, and they are still not settled today. Perhaps our legal history does not need to be revised all that much.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-372
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Quinlan case revisited.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this