The Reception of Fake News: The Interpretations and Practices That Shape the Consumption of Perceived Misinformation

María Celeste Wagner*, Pablo J. Boczkowski

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

How do people make sense of, and deal with, a changing media landscape perceived to be filled with misinformation and fake news? To answer this, we draw upon data from seventy-one in-depth interviews in Chicago, Philadelphia, and Miami. We found that perceptions about the overall media ecosystem were characterized by a: a) negative view of the current quality of news reporting, b) particular distrust of news circulation on social media; and c) concern about the effects of these trends mainly on the information habits of others. To counter these perceptions, participants indicated to rely on: a) traditional fact-based media, accompanied by a rejection of opinionated outlets; b) personal experience and knowledge; c) repetition of information across outlets; d) consumption of cross-ideological sources; e) fact-checking; and f) trust in certain personal contacts on social media, who are perceived as assessors of news quality. Our findings suggest that: a) news consumption is being ritualized in new and more personalized ways; b) social media is seen as a gateway to news partly because audiences find opinion leaders in terms of their skills as credibility assessors; and c) journalism could cater more to audiences’ demands for more fact-oriented and less discussion-based content.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)870-885
Number of pages16
JournalDigital Journalism
Volume7
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 9 2019

Keywords

  • Fake news
  • digital news
  • in-depth interviews
  • journalism
  • misinformation
  • qualitative study
  • reception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Reception of Fake News: The Interpretations and Practices That Shape the Consumption of Perceived Misinformation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this