The reckoning: The return of genomic results to 1444 participants across the eMERGE3 Network

Kathleen A. Leppig*, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Paul Appelbaum, Sharon Aufox, Harris T. Bland, Adam Buchanan, Kurt D. Christensen, Wendy K. Chung, Ellen Wright Clayton, David Crosslin, Josh Denny, Shannon DeVange, Adam Gordon, Robert C. Green, Hakon Hakonarson, Margaret H. Harr, Nora Henrikson, Christin Hoell, Ingrid A. Holm, Iftikhar J. KulloGail P. Jarvik, Philip E. Lammers, Eric B. Larson, Noralane M. Lindor, Maddalena Marasa, Melanie F. Myers, Emma Perez, Josh F. Peterson, Siddharth Pratap, Cynthia A. Prows, James D. Ralston, Hila Milo Rasouly, Dan M. Roden, Richard R. Sharp, Rajbir Singh, Gabriel Shaibi, Maureen E. Smith, Amy Sturm, Heidi A. Thiese, Sara L. Van Driest, Janet Williams, Marc S. Williams, Julia Wynn, Carrie L. Blout Zawatsky, Georgia L. Wiesner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Phase III Network was to return actionable sequence variants to 25,084 consenting participants from 10 different health care institutions across the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate system-based issues relating to the return of results (RoR) disclosure process for clinical grade research genomic tests to eMERGE3 participants. Methods: RoR processes were developed and approved by each eMERGE institution's internal review board. Investigators at each eMERGE3 site were surveyed for RoR processes related to the participant's disclosure of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants and engagement with genetic counseling. Standard statistical analysis was performed. Results: Of the 25,084 eMERGE participants, 1444 had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant identified on the eMERGEseq panel of 67 genes and 14 single nucleotide variants. Of these, 1077 (74.6%) participants had results disclosed, with 562 (38.9%) participants provided with variant-specific genetic counseling. Site-specific processes that either offered or required genetic counseling in their RoR process had an effect on whether a participant ultimately engaged with genetic counseling (P =.0052). Conclusion: The real-life experience of the multiarm eMERGE3 RoR study for returning actionable genomic results to consented research participants showed the impact of consent, method of disclosure, and genetic counseling on RoR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1130-1138
Number of pages9
JournalGenetics in Medicine
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2022

Funding

The authors thank the Coordinating Center for the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network for assistance in meeting and technical support. This phase of the eMERGE Network was initiated and funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute through the following grants: U01HG008657 (Group Health Cooperative/University of Washington), U01HG008685 (Brigham and Women's Hospital), U01HG008672 (Vanderbilt University Medical Center), U01HG008666 (Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center), U01HG006379 (Mayo Clinic), U01HG008679 (Geisinger Clinic), U01HG008680 (Columbia University Health Sciences), U01HG008684 (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), U01HG008673 (Northwestern University), U01HG008701 (Vanderbilt University Medical Center serving as the Coordinating Center), U01HG008676 (Partners Healthcare/Broad Institute), U54MD007593-10 (Meharry Medical College), and U01HG008664 (Baylor College of Medicine). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. Conceptualization K.A.L. I.A.H. I.J.K. A.K.R. G.L.W.; Data Curation: S.A. A.B. S.D. M.H.H. C.H. N.M.L. M.M. M.F.M. E.P. C.A.P. H.M.R. R.S. G.S. M.E.S. A.S. H.A.T. J.W. C.L.B.Z.; Formal Analysis: K.A.L. A.K.R. G.L.W.; Funding Acquisition: E.B.L. I.J.K. D.M.R. M.S.W. G.P.J.; Investigation: K.A.L. P.A. K.D.C. W.K.C. E.W.C. D.C. J.D. A.G. R.C.G. H.H. N.H. P.E.L. J.F.P. S.P. J.D.R. R.R.S. S.L.V.D. G.L.W.; Methodology; K.A.L. A.K.R. G.L.W.; Project Administration: S.T.B. This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board and Human Subjects Committee of each of the 10 institutions involved in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Phase III (eMERGE3) Network: Cincinnati Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Columbia University, Geisinger, Kaiser Permanente of Washington/University of Washington, Mayo Clinic, Meharry Medical Center, Northwestern University, Partners Healthcare Center, and Vanderbilt University Medical Center. This phase of the eMERGE Network was initiated and funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute through the following grants: U01HG008657 ( Group Health Cooperative/University of Washington ), U01HG008685 ( Brigham and Women's Hospital ), U01HG008672 ( Vanderbilt University Medical Center ), U01HG008666 ( Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center ), U01HG006379 ( Mayo Clinic ), U01HG008679 ( Geisinger Clinic ), U01HG008680 ( Columbia University Health Sciences ), U01HG008684 ( Children's Hospital of Philadelphia ), U01HG008673 ( Northwestern University ), U01HG008701 ( Vanderbilt University Medical Center serving as the Coordinating Center), U01HG008676 ( Partners Healthcare/Broad Institute ), U54MD007593-10 ( Meharry Medical College ), and U01HG008664 ( Baylor College of Medicine ). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Keywords

  • Consent
  • Genetic counseling
  • Genomic medicine
  • Return of results
  • eMERGE

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The reckoning: The return of genomic results to 1444 participants across the eMERGE3 Network'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this