TY - JOUR
T1 - The relation between baseline HIV drug resistance and response to antiretroviral therapy
T2 - Re-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies using a standardized data analysis plan
AU - DeGruttola, Victor
AU - Dix, Lynn
AU - D'Aquila, Richard
AU - Holder, Dan
AU - Phillips, Andrew
AU - Ait-Khaled, Mounir
AU - Baxter, John
AU - Clevenbergh, Philippe
AU - Hammer, Scott
AU - Harrigan, Richard
AU - Katzenstein, David
AU - Lanier, Randall
AU - Miller, Michael
AU - Para, Michael
AU - Yerly, Sabine
AU - Zolopa, Andrew
AU - Murray, Jeffrey
AU - Patick, Amy
AU - Miller, Veronica
AU - Castillo, Steven
AU - Pedneault, Louise
AU - Mellors, John
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - To assess the relation between resistance to antiretroviral drugs for treatment of HIV-1 infection and virological response to therapy, results from 12 different studies were re-analysed according to a standard data analysis plan. These studies included nine clinical trials and three observational cohorts. The primary end-point in our analyses was virological failure by week 24. Baseline factors that were investigated as predictors of virological failure were plasma HIV-1 RNA, the number and type of new antivetuoviral drugs in the regimen, and viral susceptibility to the drugs in the regimen, determined by genotyping or phenotyping methods. These analyses confirmed the importance of both genotypic and phenotypic drug resistance as predictors of virological failure, whether these factors were analysed separately or adjusted for other baseline confounding factors. In most of the re-analysed studies, the odds of virological failure were reduced by about twofold for each additional drug in the regimen to which the patient's virus was sensitive by genotyping methods, and by about two- to threefold for each additional drug that was sensitive by phenotyping.
AB - To assess the relation between resistance to antiretroviral drugs for treatment of HIV-1 infection and virological response to therapy, results from 12 different studies were re-analysed according to a standard data analysis plan. These studies included nine clinical trials and three observational cohorts. The primary end-point in our analyses was virological failure by week 24. Baseline factors that were investigated as predictors of virological failure were plasma HIV-1 RNA, the number and type of new antivetuoviral drugs in the regimen, and viral susceptibility to the drugs in the regimen, determined by genotyping or phenotyping methods. These analyses confirmed the importance of both genotypic and phenotypic drug resistance as predictors of virological failure, whether these factors were analysed separately or adjusted for other baseline confounding factors. In most of the re-analysed studies, the odds of virological failure were reduced by about twofold for each additional drug in the regimen to which the patient's virus was sensitive by genotyping methods, and by about two- to threefold for each additional drug that was sensitive by phenotyping.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344593433&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344593433&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 10846592
AN - SCOPUS:0344593433
SN - 1359-6535
VL - 5
SP - 41
EP - 48
JO - Antiviral Therapy
JF - Antiviral Therapy
IS - 1
ER -