TY - JOUR
T1 - The relativity of bad decisions
T2 - Social comparison as a means to alleviate regret
AU - Van Harreveld, Frenk
AU - Van Der Pligt, Joop
AU - Nordgren, Loran
PY - 2008/3
Y1 - 2008/3
N2 - In two studies, we examined the role of social comparisons in regret management. In the first study, participants received a (relatively) negative outcome after which they were presented with base-rate information about the performance of other participants in the experiment. Results showed that experienced regret decreased as a result of base-rate information showing that most others made even worse decisions than oneself. In the second study, we investigated whether people actively seek this kind of consensual information to validate their decision. After inducing regret by means of a manipulated outcome in a trivia quiz, participants could obtain information about the outcomes of previous participants or about the type of items used in the quiz. Participants' preference was determined by whether or not they believed that they would be given a second chance. In case of a negative and final outcome, participants preferred information about the prevalence of others who had an even worse outcome. When the outcome was non-final, participants preferred information about the type of items used in the test. Both strategies were accompanied with a decrease in regret. Implications for research on regret and decision making are discussed.
AB - In two studies, we examined the role of social comparisons in regret management. In the first study, participants received a (relatively) negative outcome after which they were presented with base-rate information about the performance of other participants in the experiment. Results showed that experienced regret decreased as a result of base-rate information showing that most others made even worse decisions than oneself. In the second study, we investigated whether people actively seek this kind of consensual information to validate their decision. After inducing regret by means of a manipulated outcome in a trivia quiz, participants could obtain information about the outcomes of previous participants or about the type of items used in the quiz. Participants' preference was determined by whether or not they believed that they would be given a second chance. In case of a negative and final outcome, participants preferred information about the prevalence of others who had an even worse outcome. When the outcome was non-final, participants preferred information about the type of items used in the test. Both strategies were accompanied with a decrease in regret. Implications for research on regret and decision making are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42349087184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42349087184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1348/014466607X260134
DO - 10.1348/014466607X260134
M3 - Article
C2 - 18042310
AN - SCOPUS:42349087184
SN - 0144-6665
VL - 47
SP - 105
EP - 117
JO - British Journal of Social Psychology
JF - British Journal of Social Psychology
IS - 1
ER -