The resolution and recovery of filler-gap dependencies in aphasia

Evidence from on-line anomaly detection

Michael Walsh Dickey*, Cynthia K Thompson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines the on-line processing of sentences with movement using an auditory anomaly detection task (after Boland, Tanenhaus, Garnsey, & Carlson, 1995). Eight agrammatic aphasic participants (four of whom had undergone treatment focused on comprehension and production of filler-gap sentences) and 24 young normal participants listened to sentences and pressed a button when the sentences "stopped making sense." Critical sentences contained an anomaly in object relative clauses or conjoined clauses. Results showed that both young normals and aphasic participants were able to reject anomalous sentences of both types. In addition, both groups showed evidence of filler-gap resolution on-line. Importantly, however, there was evidence of a treatment effect for the aphasic patients: those who received treatment showed better performance than those who had not. Treated patients were more successful than the untreated patients in detecting the anomaly in filler-gap conditions, rejecting the anomalous filler-gap sentences reliably more often than the non-anomalous ones, like the young normals. This effect was not noted for untreated participants, i.e., there was no statistical difference between their rejection of anomalous and non-anomalous filler gap sentences. Further, the reaction time data showed that the treated aphasic patients' rejections came before sentence's end (within 2000ms), while the majority of responses made by untreated patients did not. These results indicate that individuals with agrammatic aphasia appear to retain some gap-filling capacity and that treatment can improve their ability to make use of this capacity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)108-127
Number of pages20
JournalBrain and Language
Volume88
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

Aphasia
speech disorder
evidence
Aptitude
Therapeutics
comprehension
Reaction Time
Dependency (Psychology)
Recovery
Filler-gap Dependencies
Anomaly
Fillers
ability
Aphasic
performance
Group
Rejection (Psychology)
Rejection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

@article{c1a161c105f14c84ac6b6543faec5b9a,
title = "The resolution and recovery of filler-gap dependencies in aphasia: Evidence from on-line anomaly detection",
abstract = "This study examines the on-line processing of sentences with movement using an auditory anomaly detection task (after Boland, Tanenhaus, Garnsey, & Carlson, 1995). Eight agrammatic aphasic participants (four of whom had undergone treatment focused on comprehension and production of filler-gap sentences) and 24 young normal participants listened to sentences and pressed a button when the sentences {"}stopped making sense.{"} Critical sentences contained an anomaly in object relative clauses or conjoined clauses. Results showed that both young normals and aphasic participants were able to reject anomalous sentences of both types. In addition, both groups showed evidence of filler-gap resolution on-line. Importantly, however, there was evidence of a treatment effect for the aphasic patients: those who received treatment showed better performance than those who had not. Treated patients were more successful than the untreated patients in detecting the anomaly in filler-gap conditions, rejecting the anomalous filler-gap sentences reliably more often than the non-anomalous ones, like the young normals. This effect was not noted for untreated participants, i.e., there was no statistical difference between their rejection of anomalous and non-anomalous filler gap sentences. Further, the reaction time data showed that the treated aphasic patients' rejections came before sentence's end (within 2000ms), while the majority of responses made by untreated patients did not. These results indicate that individuals with agrammatic aphasia appear to retain some gap-filling capacity and that treatment can improve their ability to make use of this capacity.",
author = "Dickey, {Michael Walsh} and Thompson, {Cynthia K}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00283-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "108--127",
journal = "Brain and Language",
issn = "0093-934X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

The resolution and recovery of filler-gap dependencies in aphasia : Evidence from on-line anomaly detection. / Dickey, Michael Walsh; Thompson, Cynthia K.

In: Brain and Language, Vol. 88, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 108-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The resolution and recovery of filler-gap dependencies in aphasia

T2 - Evidence from on-line anomaly detection

AU - Dickey, Michael Walsh

AU - Thompson, Cynthia K

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - This study examines the on-line processing of sentences with movement using an auditory anomaly detection task (after Boland, Tanenhaus, Garnsey, & Carlson, 1995). Eight agrammatic aphasic participants (four of whom had undergone treatment focused on comprehension and production of filler-gap sentences) and 24 young normal participants listened to sentences and pressed a button when the sentences "stopped making sense." Critical sentences contained an anomaly in object relative clauses or conjoined clauses. Results showed that both young normals and aphasic participants were able to reject anomalous sentences of both types. In addition, both groups showed evidence of filler-gap resolution on-line. Importantly, however, there was evidence of a treatment effect for the aphasic patients: those who received treatment showed better performance than those who had not. Treated patients were more successful than the untreated patients in detecting the anomaly in filler-gap conditions, rejecting the anomalous filler-gap sentences reliably more often than the non-anomalous ones, like the young normals. This effect was not noted for untreated participants, i.e., there was no statistical difference between their rejection of anomalous and non-anomalous filler gap sentences. Further, the reaction time data showed that the treated aphasic patients' rejections came before sentence's end (within 2000ms), while the majority of responses made by untreated patients did not. These results indicate that individuals with agrammatic aphasia appear to retain some gap-filling capacity and that treatment can improve their ability to make use of this capacity.

AB - This study examines the on-line processing of sentences with movement using an auditory anomaly detection task (after Boland, Tanenhaus, Garnsey, & Carlson, 1995). Eight agrammatic aphasic participants (four of whom had undergone treatment focused on comprehension and production of filler-gap sentences) and 24 young normal participants listened to sentences and pressed a button when the sentences "stopped making sense." Critical sentences contained an anomaly in object relative clauses or conjoined clauses. Results showed that both young normals and aphasic participants were able to reject anomalous sentences of both types. In addition, both groups showed evidence of filler-gap resolution on-line. Importantly, however, there was evidence of a treatment effect for the aphasic patients: those who received treatment showed better performance than those who had not. Treated patients were more successful than the untreated patients in detecting the anomaly in filler-gap conditions, rejecting the anomalous filler-gap sentences reliably more often than the non-anomalous ones, like the young normals. This effect was not noted for untreated participants, i.e., there was no statistical difference between their rejection of anomalous and non-anomalous filler gap sentences. Further, the reaction time data showed that the treated aphasic patients' rejections came before sentence's end (within 2000ms), while the majority of responses made by untreated patients did not. These results indicate that individuals with agrammatic aphasia appear to retain some gap-filling capacity and that treatment can improve their ability to make use of this capacity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346786318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346786318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00283-9

DO - 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00283-9

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 108

EP - 127

JO - Brain and Language

JF - Brain and Language

SN - 0093-934X

IS - 1

ER -