The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science

Susan Feng Lu, Ginger Zhe Jin, Brian Uzzi, Benjamin Jones*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

96 Scopus citations

Abstract

Scientific articles are retracted at increasing rates, with the highest rates among top journals. Here we show that a single retraction triggers citation losses through an author's prior body of work. Compared to closely-matched control papers, citations fall by an average of 6.9% per year for each prior publication. These chain reactions are sustained on authors' papers (a) published up to a decade earlier and (b) connected within the authors' own citation network by up to 4 degrees of separation from the retracted publication. Importantly, however, citation losses among prior work disappear when authors self-report the error. Our analyses and results span the range of scientific disciplines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number3146
JournalScientific reports
Volume3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 6 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this