Abstract
During the Reconstruction era, hundreds of disenfranchised women throughout the United States attempted to register and to vote, performing a participatory argument in an ongoing public controversy about the parameters of the polity. As rhetorical rituals, these women's voting efforts displayed an alternative social order and illuminated the normative practices of citizenship as profoundly gendered. Whereas suffragists' legal rationales for direct action laid claim to citizenship as a universalist category, the intelligibility of the rituals relied on the specificity of cultural conventions. These public performances thus dramatically showcased the power and the limitations of appropriation as a strategy of protest.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-26 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Quarterly Journal of Speech |
Volume | 93 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2007 |
Keywords
- Appropriation
- Citizenship
- Rhetorical ritual
- Voting
- Woman suffrage
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
- Language and Linguistics
- Education