TY - JOUR
T1 - The Role of Communication Technologies in Serial Arguments
T2 - A Communicative Interdependence Perspective
AU - Pusateri, Kimberly B.
AU - Roaché, David J.
AU - Wang, Ningxin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - In response to scholars who recommend additional research concerning the role of communication technologies in relational conflict, we employ the communicative interdependence perspective (Caughlin & Sharabi, 2013) to explore mode integration and segmentation during serial arguments. More specifically, we found that technologically-mediated communication (TMC) and face-to-face (FtF) communication are commonly integrated during serial arguments. Mode integration was especially likely when serial arguments were seen as serious, relationally threatening, and less resolvable. Yet, integration of TMC and FtF communication and integration of multiple TMC channels during serial arguments were negatively associated with relational closeness and satisfaction for dating partners. Segmentation to one mode was rare and was not associated with relational satisfaction or closeness. We discuss the implications of these findings for the communicative interdependence perspective and our understanding of serial arguments in relationships.
AB - In response to scholars who recommend additional research concerning the role of communication technologies in relational conflict, we employ the communicative interdependence perspective (Caughlin & Sharabi, 2013) to explore mode integration and segmentation during serial arguments. More specifically, we found that technologically-mediated communication (TMC) and face-to-face (FtF) communication are commonly integrated during serial arguments. Mode integration was especially likely when serial arguments were seen as serious, relationally threatening, and less resolvable. Yet, integration of TMC and FtF communication and integration of multiple TMC channels during serial arguments were negatively associated with relational closeness and satisfaction for dating partners. Segmentation to one mode was rare and was not associated with relational satisfaction or closeness. We discuss the implications of these findings for the communicative interdependence perspective and our understanding of serial arguments in relationships.
KW - communicative interdependence
KW - conflict
KW - serial arguments
KW - technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019520842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019520842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00028533.2015.11821860
DO - 10.1080/00028533.2015.11821860
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85019520842
SN - 1051-1431
VL - 52
SP - 44
EP - 60
JO - Argumentation and Advocacy
JF - Argumentation and Advocacy
IS - 1
ER -