The role of comparison in structure learning: Developmental, learning science, and computational perspectives

Stella Christie, Dedre Gentner, Mitsumi Imai, Etsuko Haryu, Hiroyuki Okada, Ji Y Son, James Stigler, Leonidas Doumas, Robert G Morrison, Lindsey E Richland

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The ability to perceive, comprehend and reason about relations (i.e., relational thinking) is central in human cognition. Relational thinking is powerful because it is structured. Specifically, relational thought allows inferences and generalizations that are constrained by the roles that elements play, rather than strictly the properties of the elements themselves. The role of relational comparisons in learning is emerging as an important area of developmental and learning science research. Relational comparisons allow learners to derive symbolic, abstract, and conceptual knowledge representations that are generative, in that children and adults can then use them broadly in new contexts to reason about new elements. Indeed, comparison seems to underlie the very development of the structured relational representations that underlie relational cognition. This symposium aims to bring to together research on the role of comparison in developmental and adult learning. Specifically, we present research on the role of comparison in the development of spatial reasoning, language learning, adult mathematics learning, and computational approaches to learning structured (i.e., symbolic) representations.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
EditorsNaomi Miyake, David Peebles, Richard P Cooper
PublisherCognitive Science Society
Pages34-35
Number of pages2
ISBN (Print)978-0-9768318-8-4
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of comparison in structure learning: Developmental, learning science, and computational perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this