TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of expectancy in hypnotic hypermnesia
T2 - A Brief Communication
AU - Grabowski, Karen L.
AU - Roese, Neal J.
AU - Thomas, Michael R.
PY - 1991/10/1
Y1 - 1991/10/1
N2 - Previous research has yielded equivocal evidence of hypnotic memory enhancement. The present experiment assessed the effects of expectancy and hypnotizability on recall for videotaped material under waking and hypnotic conditions. Ss (N = 138) were informed of hypnotic induction either before (expectancy condition) or after (no expectancy condition) watching a videotaped enactment of a crime and completing an initial waking recall test (Rl). Both groups then underwent hypnotic induction, and completed the test again (R2). Ss’ raw recall scores were significantly greater under hypnotic than waking conditions, but this hypermnesia was not evident when scores were corrected for mere increase in rate of responding. Ss expecting later hypnosis scored significantly higher than Ss with no such expectations, but again, this difference was not evident in corrected scores. Hypnotizability of Ss was, however, related to corrected recall, with high hypnotizable Ss displaying the greatest increase in rate of responding from Rl to R2. No evidence for the hypothesized '’suppression effect” underlying hypnotic hypermnesia was found.
AB - Previous research has yielded equivocal evidence of hypnotic memory enhancement. The present experiment assessed the effects of expectancy and hypnotizability on recall for videotaped material under waking and hypnotic conditions. Ss (N = 138) were informed of hypnotic induction either before (expectancy condition) or after (no expectancy condition) watching a videotaped enactment of a crime and completing an initial waking recall test (Rl). Both groups then underwent hypnotic induction, and completed the test again (R2). Ss’ raw recall scores were significantly greater under hypnotic than waking conditions, but this hypermnesia was not evident when scores were corrected for mere increase in rate of responding. Ss expecting later hypnosis scored significantly higher than Ss with no such expectations, but again, this difference was not evident in corrected scores. Hypnotizability of Ss was, however, related to corrected recall, with high hypnotizable Ss displaying the greatest increase in rate of responding from Rl to R2. No evidence for the hypothesized '’suppression effect” underlying hypnotic hypermnesia was found.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025936689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025936689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00207149108409635
DO - 10.1080/00207149108409635
M3 - Article
C2 - 1937989
AN - SCOPUS:0025936689
SN - 0020-7144
VL - 39
SP - 193
EP - 197
JO - International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
JF - International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
IS - 4
ER -