The role of neurocritical care: A brief report on the survey results of neurosciences and critical care specialists

Manjunath Markandaya*, Katherine P. Thomas, Babak Jahromi, Mathew Koenig, Alan H. Lockwood, Paul A. Nyquist, Marek Mirski, Romergryko Geocadin, Wendy C. Ziai

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Neurocritical care is a new subspecialty field in medicine that intersects with many of the neuroscience and critical care specialties, and continues to evolve in its scope of practice and practitioners. The objective of this study was to assess the perceived need for and roles of neurocritical care intensivists and neurointensive care units among physicians involved with intensive care and the neurosciences. Methods An online survey of physicians practicing critical care medicine, and neurology was performed during the 2008 Leapfrog initiative to formally recognize neurocritical care training. Results The survey closed in July 2009 and achieved a 13% response rate (980/7524 physicians surveyed). Survey respondents (mostly from North America) included 362 (41.4%) neurologists, 164 (18.8%) internists, 104 (11.9%) pediatric intensivists, 82 (9.4%) anesthesiologists, and 162 (18.5%) from other specialties. Over 70% of respondents reported that the availability of neurocritical care units staffed with neurointensivists would improve the quality of care of critically ill neurological/neurosurgical patients. Neurologists were reported as the most appropriate specialty for training in neurointensive care by 53.3%, and 57% of respondents responded positively that neurology residency programs should offer a separate training track for those interested in neurocritical care. Conclusion Broad level of support exists among the survey respondents (mostly neurologists and intensivists) for the establishment of neurological critical care units. Since neurology remains the predominant career path from which to draw neurointensivists, there may be a role for more comprehensive neurointensive care training within neurology residencies or an alternative training track for interested residents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)72-81
Number of pages10
JournalNeurocritical Care
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2012

Fingerprint

Critical Care
Neurosciences
Neurology
Internship and Residency
Physicians
Medicine
Surveys and Questionnaires
Quality of Health Care
North America
Critical Illness
Pediatrics
Neurologists

Keywords

  • Critical care
  • Education
  • Neurocritical care
  • Neurointensivists
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Markandaya, Manjunath ; Thomas, Katherine P. ; Jahromi, Babak ; Koenig, Mathew ; Lockwood, Alan H. ; Nyquist, Paul A. ; Mirski, Marek ; Geocadin, Romergryko ; Ziai, Wendy C. / The role of neurocritical care : A brief report on the survey results of neurosciences and critical care specialists. In: Neurocritical Care. 2012 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 72-81.
@article{5f5af47659b24e04887c1f3ace8884cc,
title = "The role of neurocritical care: A brief report on the survey results of neurosciences and critical care specialists",
abstract = "Background Neurocritical care is a new subspecialty field in medicine that intersects with many of the neuroscience and critical care specialties, and continues to evolve in its scope of practice and practitioners. The objective of this study was to assess the perceived need for and roles of neurocritical care intensivists and neurointensive care units among physicians involved with intensive care and the neurosciences. Methods An online survey of physicians practicing critical care medicine, and neurology was performed during the 2008 Leapfrog initiative to formally recognize neurocritical care training. Results The survey closed in July 2009 and achieved a 13{\%} response rate (980/7524 physicians surveyed). Survey respondents (mostly from North America) included 362 (41.4{\%}) neurologists, 164 (18.8{\%}) internists, 104 (11.9{\%}) pediatric intensivists, 82 (9.4{\%}) anesthesiologists, and 162 (18.5{\%}) from other specialties. Over 70{\%} of respondents reported that the availability of neurocritical care units staffed with neurointensivists would improve the quality of care of critically ill neurological/neurosurgical patients. Neurologists were reported as the most appropriate specialty for training in neurointensive care by 53.3{\%}, and 57{\%} of respondents responded positively that neurology residency programs should offer a separate training track for those interested in neurocritical care. Conclusion Broad level of support exists among the survey respondents (mostly neurologists and intensivists) for the establishment of neurological critical care units. Since neurology remains the predominant career path from which to draw neurointensivists, there may be a role for more comprehensive neurointensive care training within neurology residencies or an alternative training track for interested residents.",
keywords = "Critical care, Education, Neurocritical care, Neurointensivists, Survey",
author = "Manjunath Markandaya and Thomas, {Katherine P.} and Babak Jahromi and Mathew Koenig and Lockwood, {Alan H.} and Nyquist, {Paul A.} and Marek Mirski and Romergryko Geocadin and Ziai, {Wendy C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12028-011-9628-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "72--81",
journal = "Neurocritical Care",
issn = "1541-6933",
publisher = "Humana Press",
number = "1",

}

Markandaya, M, Thomas, KP, Jahromi, B, Koenig, M, Lockwood, AH, Nyquist, PA, Mirski, M, Geocadin, R & Ziai, WC 2012, 'The role of neurocritical care: A brief report on the survey results of neurosciences and critical care specialists', Neurocritical Care, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9628-2

The role of neurocritical care : A brief report on the survey results of neurosciences and critical care specialists. / Markandaya, Manjunath; Thomas, Katherine P.; Jahromi, Babak; Koenig, Mathew; Lockwood, Alan H.; Nyquist, Paul A.; Mirski, Marek; Geocadin, Romergryko; Ziai, Wendy C.

In: Neurocritical Care, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.02.2012, p. 72-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of neurocritical care

T2 - A brief report on the survey results of neurosciences and critical care specialists

AU - Markandaya, Manjunath

AU - Thomas, Katherine P.

AU - Jahromi, Babak

AU - Koenig, Mathew

AU - Lockwood, Alan H.

AU - Nyquist, Paul A.

AU - Mirski, Marek

AU - Geocadin, Romergryko

AU - Ziai, Wendy C.

PY - 2012/2/1

Y1 - 2012/2/1

N2 - Background Neurocritical care is a new subspecialty field in medicine that intersects with many of the neuroscience and critical care specialties, and continues to evolve in its scope of practice and practitioners. The objective of this study was to assess the perceived need for and roles of neurocritical care intensivists and neurointensive care units among physicians involved with intensive care and the neurosciences. Methods An online survey of physicians practicing critical care medicine, and neurology was performed during the 2008 Leapfrog initiative to formally recognize neurocritical care training. Results The survey closed in July 2009 and achieved a 13% response rate (980/7524 physicians surveyed). Survey respondents (mostly from North America) included 362 (41.4%) neurologists, 164 (18.8%) internists, 104 (11.9%) pediatric intensivists, 82 (9.4%) anesthesiologists, and 162 (18.5%) from other specialties. Over 70% of respondents reported that the availability of neurocritical care units staffed with neurointensivists would improve the quality of care of critically ill neurological/neurosurgical patients. Neurologists were reported as the most appropriate specialty for training in neurointensive care by 53.3%, and 57% of respondents responded positively that neurology residency programs should offer a separate training track for those interested in neurocritical care. Conclusion Broad level of support exists among the survey respondents (mostly neurologists and intensivists) for the establishment of neurological critical care units. Since neurology remains the predominant career path from which to draw neurointensivists, there may be a role for more comprehensive neurointensive care training within neurology residencies or an alternative training track for interested residents.

AB - Background Neurocritical care is a new subspecialty field in medicine that intersects with many of the neuroscience and critical care specialties, and continues to evolve in its scope of practice and practitioners. The objective of this study was to assess the perceived need for and roles of neurocritical care intensivists and neurointensive care units among physicians involved with intensive care and the neurosciences. Methods An online survey of physicians practicing critical care medicine, and neurology was performed during the 2008 Leapfrog initiative to formally recognize neurocritical care training. Results The survey closed in July 2009 and achieved a 13% response rate (980/7524 physicians surveyed). Survey respondents (mostly from North America) included 362 (41.4%) neurologists, 164 (18.8%) internists, 104 (11.9%) pediatric intensivists, 82 (9.4%) anesthesiologists, and 162 (18.5%) from other specialties. Over 70% of respondents reported that the availability of neurocritical care units staffed with neurointensivists would improve the quality of care of critically ill neurological/neurosurgical patients. Neurologists were reported as the most appropriate specialty for training in neurointensive care by 53.3%, and 57% of respondents responded positively that neurology residency programs should offer a separate training track for those interested in neurocritical care. Conclusion Broad level of support exists among the survey respondents (mostly neurologists and intensivists) for the establishment of neurological critical care units. Since neurology remains the predominant career path from which to draw neurointensivists, there may be a role for more comprehensive neurointensive care training within neurology residencies or an alternative training track for interested residents.

KW - Critical care

KW - Education

KW - Neurocritical care

KW - Neurointensivists

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859495033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859495033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12028-011-9628-2

DO - 10.1007/s12028-011-9628-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 21922343

AN - SCOPUS:84859495033

VL - 16

SP - 72

EP - 81

JO - Neurocritical Care

JF - Neurocritical Care

SN - 1541-6933

IS - 1

ER -