TY - JOUR
T1 - The ryobi “air-clean” 4-cycle engine
T2 - A case study in engineering and manufacturing management
AU - Conley, James G.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author would like to thank all Japan and US based members of the AC Project Team for their diligence, perseverance and commitment to help make the innovative AC 4-cycle engine concept a reality. The author acknowledges the Eugene and Bonnie Nugent/Pentair Corporation endowment at Northwestern University for providing funds to support the manuscript preparation.
PY - 1998/6
Y1 - 1998/6
N2 - A number of TQM processes were employed during the rapid development of the revolutionary “Air Clean” (AC), four cycle engine recently introduced by the Ryobi Group of companies. A dynamic, cross functional team organization was used to involve all functions. A simple form of quality function deployment was used to identify desirable product design, safety and service features. The challenges presented by the QFD data were combined with identified design for assembly and design for manufacturing concerns to create the project schedule together with a flow plan for concurrent engineering. Statistical process control of critical machined dimensions was introduced to avoid tolerance stack-up and performance variability. The actual performance of the team verses planned scheduling targets will be compared. Team dynamics and midterm organizational changes required to satisfy design, cost and performance objectives will be reviewed. Important planning mnemonics and graphics used to educate team members and execute the plan will be presented. Finally, the technological breakthroughs achieved during the program will be presented.
AB - A number of TQM processes were employed during the rapid development of the revolutionary “Air Clean” (AC), four cycle engine recently introduced by the Ryobi Group of companies. A dynamic, cross functional team organization was used to involve all functions. A simple form of quality function deployment was used to identify desirable product design, safety and service features. The challenges presented by the QFD data were combined with identified design for assembly and design for manufacturing concerns to create the project schedule together with a flow plan for concurrent engineering. Statistical process control of critical machined dimensions was introduced to avoid tolerance stack-up and performance variability. The actual performance of the team verses planned scheduling targets will be compared. Team dynamics and midterm organizational changes required to satisfy design, cost and performance objectives will be reviewed. Important planning mnemonics and graphics used to educate team members and execute the plan will be presented. Finally, the technological breakthroughs achieved during the program will be presented.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032284295&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032284295&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10429247.1998.11414982
DO - 10.1080/10429247.1998.11414982
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0032284295
SN - 1042-9247
VL - 10
SP - 23
EP - 31
JO - EMJ - Engineering Management Journal
JF - EMJ - Engineering Management Journal
IS - 2
ER -