TY - JOUR
T1 - The safety of intravenous diuretics alone versus diuretics plus parenteral vasoactive therapies in hospitalized patients with acutely decompensated heart failure
T2 - A propensity score and instrumental variable analysis using the Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) database
AU - Costanzo, Maria Rosa
AU - Johannes, R. S.
AU - Pine, Michael
AU - Gupta, Vikas
AU - Saltzberg, Mitchell
AU - Hay, Joel
AU - Yancy, Clyde W.
AU - Fonarow, Gregg C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr Costanzo, Dr Saltzberg, Dr Yancy, and Dr Fonarow have received honoraria and have served as consultants for Scios Inc. Dr Gupta has received honoraria from Scios Inc, Mountain View, CA. Dr Hay has served as a consultant to Scios Inc. The Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) and this study were funded by Scios Inc. Access to the ADHERE database was provided by the Scientific Advisory Committee for ADHERE. The investigators designed and executed the analysis and prepared this manuscript independent of the sponsor, Scios Inc. The sponsor reviewed the results of the analysis and the manuscript. However, neither results nor manuscript were altered as a consequence of the sponsor's review.
PY - 2007/8
Y1 - 2007/8
N2 - Background: The treatment of acute decompensated heart failure remains problematic and most often requires parenteral therapies. Significant concerns have been expressed regarding risks and benefits of individual therapies, especially nesiritide (NES), but few studies have compared the relative safety of varied intravenous therapies on clinical outcomes. Methods: We compared the safety of intravenous diuretics (DIUR), inotropes (INO), and vasodilators (nitroglycerin [NTG]) on mortality rates and worsening renal function in 99 963 inpatients with acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Patients with a diagnosis of ADHF within 48 hours were grouped by intended primary treatment (intravenous agents administered during the first 2 hours of intravenous therapy). Treatments studied were (a) intended monotherapy (DIUR), (b) intended combination therapy (DIUR + NES, NTG, or INO), and (c) sequential therapy (intended DIUR monotherapy followed by a second agent administered >2 hours later). Propensity-matched cohorts and instrumental analysis were used to adjust for differences among patients in treatment groups. Results: Intended DIUR monotherapy yielded an unadjusted inpatient mortality rate of 3.2%. After intended DIUR monotherapy, inpatient mortality was not higher for sequential use of NES than for sequential use of NTG (3.4% vs 6.2%, P = .0028). In all regimens, INOs were associated with higher inpatient mortality than were diuretics or vasodilators used alone. The rate of worsening renal function was higher with combination of diuretic-based regimens with NES (risk ratio 1.44, P < .0001) or NTG (RR 1.2, P = .012) compared with diuretics alone. Conclusions: Compared with alternative intravenous regimens, administration of vasodilators, including NES, was not associated with increased inpatient mortality. A large randomized controlled clinical trial is being planned to prospectively address the question of risks and benefits of NES for ADHF.
AB - Background: The treatment of acute decompensated heart failure remains problematic and most often requires parenteral therapies. Significant concerns have been expressed regarding risks and benefits of individual therapies, especially nesiritide (NES), but few studies have compared the relative safety of varied intravenous therapies on clinical outcomes. Methods: We compared the safety of intravenous diuretics (DIUR), inotropes (INO), and vasodilators (nitroglycerin [NTG]) on mortality rates and worsening renal function in 99 963 inpatients with acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Patients with a diagnosis of ADHF within 48 hours were grouped by intended primary treatment (intravenous agents administered during the first 2 hours of intravenous therapy). Treatments studied were (a) intended monotherapy (DIUR), (b) intended combination therapy (DIUR + NES, NTG, or INO), and (c) sequential therapy (intended DIUR monotherapy followed by a second agent administered >2 hours later). Propensity-matched cohorts and instrumental analysis were used to adjust for differences among patients in treatment groups. Results: Intended DIUR monotherapy yielded an unadjusted inpatient mortality rate of 3.2%. After intended DIUR monotherapy, inpatient mortality was not higher for sequential use of NES than for sequential use of NTG (3.4% vs 6.2%, P = .0028). In all regimens, INOs were associated with higher inpatient mortality than were diuretics or vasodilators used alone. The rate of worsening renal function was higher with combination of diuretic-based regimens with NES (risk ratio 1.44, P < .0001) or NTG (RR 1.2, P = .012) compared with diuretics alone. Conclusions: Compared with alternative intravenous regimens, administration of vasodilators, including NES, was not associated with increased inpatient mortality. A large randomized controlled clinical trial is being planned to prospectively address the question of risks and benefits of NES for ADHF.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447563655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447563655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.04.033
DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.04.033
M3 - Article
C2 - 17643575
AN - SCOPUS:34447563655
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 154
SP - 267
EP - 277
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 2
ER -