TY - JOUR
T1 - The second Chicago Televised Smoking Cessation Program
T2 - A 24-month follow- up
AU - Warnecke, R. B.
AU - Langenberg, P.
AU - Siu Chi Wong, Chi Wong
AU - Flay, B. R.
AU - Cook, T. D.
PY - 1992
Y1 - 1992
N2 - Objectives. As smoking decreases in the population, the remaining smoking population will change, and cessation initiatives will have to incorporate strategies designed for these smokers. Methods. To study patterns of response to a cessation intervention composed of 20 televised segments and the American Lung Association Freedom from Smoking in 20 Days manual, this study compared cessation rates over 24 months in a cohort of smokers who registered for a cessation program with those in a cohort selected from the smoking population at large. Results. At post intervention, multiple point prevalence of cessation among participants, adjusted for baseline smoking, was 14% among registrants and 6% in the population; at 24 months the adjusted rates were 6% and 2%, respectively. Heavy smokers benefited more than light smokers, and there was a consistent dose-response relationship between extent of exposure to the intervention and cessation. Conclusion. The effects of the intervention were strongest for those who read the manual and watched the programs daily. Manual use was important, and those who did not read it did not appear to benefit. Compared to the population and given full participation, heavy smokers benefited more than lighter smokers.
AB - Objectives. As smoking decreases in the population, the remaining smoking population will change, and cessation initiatives will have to incorporate strategies designed for these smokers. Methods. To study patterns of response to a cessation intervention composed of 20 televised segments and the American Lung Association Freedom from Smoking in 20 Days manual, this study compared cessation rates over 24 months in a cohort of smokers who registered for a cessation program with those in a cohort selected from the smoking population at large. Results. At post intervention, multiple point prevalence of cessation among participants, adjusted for baseline smoking, was 14% among registrants and 6% in the population; at 24 months the adjusted rates were 6% and 2%, respectively. Heavy smokers benefited more than light smokers, and there was a consistent dose-response relationship between extent of exposure to the intervention and cessation. Conclusion. The effects of the intervention were strongest for those who read the manual and watched the programs daily. Manual use was important, and those who did not read it did not appear to benefit. Compared to the population and given full participation, heavy smokers benefited more than lighter smokers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026654905&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026654905&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.82.6.835
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.82.6.835
M3 - Article
C2 - 1585964
AN - SCOPUS:0026654905
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 82
SP - 835
EP - 840
JO - American journal of public health
JF - American journal of public health
IS - 6
ER -