Abstract
Rational choice models suggest that decisions should be both deliberate and calculative. In contrast, the current research suggests that calculations may lead to unintended social and moral consequences. We tested whether engaging in a calculative task would lead decision makers to overlook the social and moral consequences of their subsequent decisions and act selfishly and unethically. In each of the first four experiments, participants first completed either a calculative or a comparable, non-calculative task followed by an ostensibly unrelated decision task (either a Dictator or a modified Ultimatum Game). Compared to the non-calculative tasks, completing the calculative tasks led people to be consistently more selfish in the Dictator Game and more unethical in the modified Ultimatum Game. A final experiment tested whether the calculative task led to more self-interested behavior through increased utilitarian judgments and dampened emotional reactions; it also examined whether a subtle, social intervention might mitigate these effects.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 39-49 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes |
| Volume | 125 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2014 |
Funding
We are particularly appreciative of the financial support that we have received from the Dispute Resolution Research Center and the Zell Center for Risk Research at the Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University . We also thank Rachel Croson, Uri Gneezy, Ben Mermelstein, Scott Ogawa, Al Roth, and Andy Schotter for their tremendous comments and suggestions on previous versions of this paper. Additional material, including several studies in this project that are not reported here, can be found in the online Supplemental materials.
Keywords
- Calculative
- Ethical
- Rational
- Selfish
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Applied Psychology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management