TY - JOUR
T1 - The support for economic inequality scale
T2 - Development and adjudication
AU - Wiwad, Dylan
AU - Mercier, Brett
AU - Maraun, Michael D.
AU - Robinson, Angela R.
AU - Piff, Paul K.
AU - Aknin, Lara B.
AU - Shariff, Azim F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wiwad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Past research has documented myriad pernicious psychological effects of high economic inequality, prompting interest into how people perceive, evaluate, and react to inequality. Here we propose, refine, and validate the Support for Economic Inequality Scale (SEIS)–a novel measure of attitudes towards economic inequality. In Study 1, we distill eighteen items down to five, providing evidence for unidimensionality and reliability. In Study 2, we replicate the scale’s unidimensionality and reliability and demonstrate its validity. In Study 3, we evaluate a United States version of the SEIS. Finally, in Studies 4–5, we demonstrate the SEIS’s convergent and predictive validity, as well as evidence for the SEIS being distinct from other conceptually similar measures. The SEIS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing perceptions of and reactions to economic inequality and provides a useful tool for researchers investigating the psychological underpinnings of economic inequality.
AB - Past research has documented myriad pernicious psychological effects of high economic inequality, prompting interest into how people perceive, evaluate, and react to inequality. Here we propose, refine, and validate the Support for Economic Inequality Scale (SEIS)–a novel measure of attitudes towards economic inequality. In Study 1, we distill eighteen items down to five, providing evidence for unidimensionality and reliability. In Study 2, we replicate the scale’s unidimensionality and reliability and demonstrate its validity. In Study 3, we evaluate a United States version of the SEIS. Finally, in Studies 4–5, we demonstrate the SEIS’s convergent and predictive validity, as well as evidence for the SEIS being distinct from other conceptually similar measures. The SEIS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing perceptions of and reactions to economic inequality and provides a useful tool for researchers investigating the psychological underpinnings of economic inequality.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067629024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067629024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0218685
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0218685
M3 - Article
C2 - 31226135
AN - SCOPUS:85067629024
VL - 14
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
SN - 1932-6203
IS - 6
M1 - e0218685
ER -
